Undergrad Are electron bands symmetric in the reciprocal space?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of electron band symmetry in reciprocal space, specifically regarding Kramers theorem, which states that energy bands should satisfy the condition E(-k) = E(k). However, the observed band structures do not always appear symmetric, particularly in diagrams that represent multiple directions in k space. The confusion arises from the fact that energy band diagrams often depict paths through k space rather than a single direction, leading to misinterpretations of symmetry. The diagram in question uses different Miller indices, which further complicates the analysis of symmetry. Understanding the layout of these diagrams is crucial for accurate interpretation of band structures.
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Hi, in the lecture notes my professor gave us, it is stated that, due to Kramers theorem, the energy in a band must satisfy this condition:
$$E(-k) = E(k)$$
But, judging from actual pictures of band structures I don't find this condition to be true. Here's a (random) picture
15690962134621080100212305718610.jpg

I guess it looks "kind of" symmetric in the lower bands, but I wouldn't certainly call it that way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure you know how to read the diagram correctly. The part left of the middle is actually a different direction or slice than the right half of the diagram. That is typical situation for energy band diagrams. Instead of just plotting how the energy bands go along one direction, it takes a path through k space. Often points on the path are labeled with letters like ##\Gamma##, but in your case it seems to have indicated the direction with vectors. I borrowed this diagram for education purposes. So you would not see in the diagram what happens if you keep going from M to ##\Gamma## until the end, because once you hit ##\Gamma## the path actually turns up to Z. They do this so a 2D plot can show what happens in multiple directions, but it won't show the symmetry you're seeking.
1569102881024.png
 

Attachments

  • 1569102849758.png
    1569102849758.png
    19.7 KB · Views: 406
  • Like
Likes aaroman and dRic2
1000 times thank you. I didn't even notice that the Miller indexes are different.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K