Are EM Waves Generated by Standing Charges?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether electromagnetic (EM) waves can be generated by standing charges, as textbooks primarily address moving charges. It is clarified that while standing charges exert forces through electric fields, EM waves require changing electric and magnetic fields, as described by Maxwell's equations. The concept of a "carrier" for the force between non-moving charges is debated, with the conclusion that no physical carrier is necessary for the interaction, as EM waves can propagate through a vacuum. Virtual photons are mentioned as mediators of force between charges, but they do not constitute detectable waves like real photons do when charges are accelerated. The conversation concludes with a recognition of the complexities involved in understanding these interactions.
jrt101
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Text books talk about EM waves from moving charges, but don't mention EM waves radiating from a standing ie. not moving charge?

I would think that for one standing charge to exert a force on a second standing charge, there must be a carrier particle/wave. Is this not an EM wave?

Thanks!

Jon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The action at a distance that effects the non-moving charge is known as an electric field, and the force arises from the fact that the Force, F, equals the Electric field, E, divided by the test charge q (F=E/q).

An EM wave is caused by a changing electric field, which in turns causes a changing magnetic field, and vice-versa. All this is a consequence of Maxwell's equations.

But what you may be confused about is that the carrier, at it may be called, does not exist. An EM wave can travel through vacuum. It requires no carrier.

Hope this helped.
 
By "carrier particle" I didn't mean the medium in which the wave travels (air, water, vacuum etc.) but the way one charged particle learns that there is another charged particle nearby, and then acts according to the electric field equation.

Something must travel from the first particle to the second. No?
 
I haven't had any lectures on quantum ED yet, but as I understand it the particles that cause the force in the non-moving case are only virtual Photons, they "transport" momentum between the two electrons but do not affect any other particle, therefore cannot be detected. So they do not form a wave. If the electron is accelerated, there also appear "real" Photons who can be detected.
 
That seems reasonable. . . at least reasonable enough that I can stop thinking about it for a while. Thanks for your help brentd49 and kuengb.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top