Are Images of Space Distorted by Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
Images of space can be influenced by gravitational effects, particularly through phenomena like gravitational lensing, which bends light from distant objects. While gravity does distort light paths, this distortion is often minimal and not easily noticeable in most media images. Supernovae, initially appearing as point sources, do not significantly distort images due to weak gravitational fields after their explosion. Gravitational redshift has a minor impact on observations, primarily affecting short wavelengths and leading to subtle changes in spectral lines. Overall, while gravity can distort our view of the universe, there are methods to identify and account for these effects in astronomical imaging.
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
I've seen images of space many times in the media. Do the images that we see acurately depict the universe? Or are the images so distorted by gravity that the true structure of the universe and various objects in it are not readily revealed?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
I've seen images of space many times in the media. Do the images that we see acurately depict the universe? Or are the images so distorted by gravity that the true structure of the universe and various objects in it are not readily revealed?

Not attractive gravity, but I'm quite sure that repulsive gravity distorts our vision - a lot - more than than most people want it too. If Io, Europa, and Pioneer give us any clue, it proves that we know little to nothing about the our own solar system, much less the optical properties outside it.
 
Last edited:
dimensionless said:
I've seen images of space many times in the media. Do the images that we see acurately depict the universe? Or are the images so distorted by gravity that the true structure of the universe and various objects in it are not readily revealed?

Gravity does bend the path of light, but it's usually not noticable in the pictures you see in the media. There are some exceptions, however. Here is one image in which a galaxy cluster's gravity is bending the light of the objects behind it:

http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/images/lens2.jpg"

Fortunately, there are several ways to tell when an image is being significantly altered by gravitational lensing (e.g. magnification, distortion), so it's not usually a problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was thinking along the lines of a super nova. There you would have a rather large object, and likely a very irregular gravitational field as well.
 
dimensionless said:
I was thinking along the lines of a super nova. There you would have a rather large object, and likely a very irregular gravitational field as well.

At the time of the exposion, supernovae appear to us as point sources (that is, we can't resolve their extent), so there's nothing really to distort. Eventually, the remnants of the supernova expand to a size where we can resolve it, but at this point the gravitational fields are far too weak to produce any distortion of the image.
 
Gravitational redshift is a minor player, even in the case of matter falling into a black hole. The major fireworks occur before gravitational redshift asserts any noticeable effects. Only at short wavelengths would the effect be noticeable - and difficult to observe [weak signal]. The net effect would smear emission lines - as observed in quasar spectral lines.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
226
Views
15K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top