Are Linear and Tangential Acceleration Just Angular Values Times the Radius?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular and linear velocities, as well as radial and tangential accelerations of a fighter pilot in a centrifuge. The pilot's angular velocity at t = 4 is determined to be 12.2 rad/sec, leading to a linear velocity of 183 m/sec. Radial acceleration is calculated as 5.96 rad/sec², while tangential acceleration is derived from this value. The participants confirm that linear and tangential accelerations can indeed be expressed as angular values multiplied by the radius, reinforcing the relationship between these quantities. Understanding these relationships helps clarify the calculations involved in rotational motion.
forty
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Question:
A fighter pilot is being trained in a centrifuge of radius 15m. it rotates according to theta=0.25(t^3) + ln(t+1) befor it stabilises (theta in radians). what are the magnitudes of the pilots:

a) angular velocity: d(theta)/dt at t = 4 (12.2 rad/sec)

b) linear velocity: 12.2 * 15

c radial acceleration: 2nd derivative of theta=0.25(t^3) + ln(t+1) at t = 4 (5.96rad/sec^2)

d) tangential acceleration: 5.96 * 15

Are b and d just the angular values times the radius that's if a and c are right in the first place??


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
forty said:
Are b and d just the angular values times the radius that's if a and c are right in the first place??

Yes! :smile:

(v = rω and dv/dt = (d/dt)(rω) = r(dω/dt), since r is constant.)

But why was that worrying you? :confused:
 
Because all the angular equivalents scare me!
 
… just keep differentiating rθ …

Hi forty! :smile:

Just remember the definition of a radian: the angle whose arc-length = r.

And therefore generally:
tangential length = rθ.​

So (if r is constant), differentiate once for:

tangential speed v = rθ´ = rω

tangential acceleration a = rθ´´ = rω´. :smile:
(and of course radial acceleration = -rω² = -vω = -v²/r.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top