Are open-air distillation and simple distillation the same?

AI Thread Summary
Open-air distillation and simple distillation are not the same, as open-air distillation typically refers to a process conducted without a controlled environment, while simple distillation is a more defined laboratory technique. Simple distillation is often contrasted with methods like vacuum distillation or distillation under an inert atmosphere, which provide different conditions for separation. The terminology can vary, leading to confusion about their equivalence. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate laboratory procedures. Clarity on these terms can enhance the effectiveness of distillation experiments in organic chemistry.
alphaj
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There really is no problem for this. I am just writing my procedure for orgo lab and I haven't don't any distillation before. I tried googling "open-air" distillation to see if it was equivalent to simple distillation, but I can't seem to get a straight answer.

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


n/a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don’t recall ever specifically using the phrase “open air distillation” (or “simple distillation,” for that matter), but I’m assuming it is in contrast to, e.g., vacuum distillation or distillation under an inert atmosphere.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top