Are prime fractals, or have a fractal geometry ?

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
are prime fractals, or have a fractal geometry ??

my idea is, if we consider the geometry of primes could we conclude they form a fractal ? , for example if we represent all the primes using a computer, it will give us a fractal pattern.

according to a paper http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/chao-dyn/pdf/9406/9406003v1.pdf

zeta function (which is just a product of primes for s >1) could be a fractal, but how about primes ?¿?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In what sense are you saying the primes are (or may be) fractals? Are they self-similar? Do they have non-integer dimension?
 


my question is, if we use the Sieve of Eratosthenes.. for big scales (let us say 1000000000000000000000000 primes or similar) then the picture drawn is a fractal, for example.
 


If I interpret your question correctly: no, they don't, because of the prime number theorem.
 


zetafunction said:
my idea is, if we consider the geometry of primes could we conclude they form a fractal ? , for example if we represent all the primes using a computer, it will give us a fractal pattern.

according to a paper http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/chao-dyn/pdf/9406/9406003v1.pdf

zeta function (which is just a product of primes for s >1) could be a fractal, but how about primes ?¿?

This is an amazing question, was thinking about it last night. PGP and Gnupg both use prime numbers to generate the keys. If the Mandelbrot fractal pattern that Mandelbrot saw in the noise in the network lines is the same as the fractal's chaotic patterns we see then hummmmmmmmm...this is a good very good question, did you get an answer yet?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top