Are Small-Scale Fusion Reactors the Future of Electric Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparkle_pony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Scale
AI Thread Summary
Promising concepts for small-scale fusion reactors include alternative confinement methods such as spheromaks, field reversed configurations (FRCs), and magnetized target fusion, among others. While these alternatives have shown potential in small-scale experiments, they lack the extensive research and testing that tokamaks have received. Current small-scale experiments demonstrate good confinement scaling, but challenges seen in larger tokamaks are likely to emerge as these concepts scale up. Ultimately, the field remains uncertain regarding the feasibility of achieving net energy production in such compact designs. The consensus is that more research is needed to determine the viability of small-scale fusion reactors.
sparkle_pony
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Do you know of any promising concepts for small scale fusion reactors (for electric power production)?

I'm thinking of something the size of, say, a train car or even smaller.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sparkle_pony said:
Do you know of any promising concepts for small scale fusion reactors (for electric power production)?

I'm thinking of something the size of, say, a train car or even smaller.
Right now, we'd settle for any size that produces net energy.
 
sparkle_pony said:
Do you know of any promising concepts for small scale fusion reactors (for electric power production)?

I'm thinking of something the size of, say, a train car or even smaller.

There are a number of alternative confinement concepts. To name a few there are spheromaks, field reversed configurations (FRCs), reversed field pinches, levitated dipoles, magnetised target fusion, polywell, etc. While modern day tokamaks greatly outperform these alternative concepts, tokamaks have also received the lion's share of the research effort. Many of alternative concepts have on been tested on relatively small scale experiments. The truth is that these experiments are too small to make believable predictions concerning their confinement properties at reactor relevant conditions.The honest answer to your question is that we don't know.

If you want to optimistic a number of smaller experiments have shown good confinement scaling at small scale. But so do small tokamaks, and I suspect that many of the difficulties that only arise in larger scale tokamaks will also arise as these alternatives go to larger scales.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top