Are temperature and pressure related by relativity?

Gerald Kaiser
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Since the temperature of a gas is related to its average molecular energy and the pressure to the average molecular momentum, it would seem that a Lorentz transformation would somehow relate the two. Does anyone know of related work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The temperature and pressure of a fluid is related to those properties in the fluid's rest frame. The temperature and pressure are related via an equation of state such as the ideal gas law. Lorentz transformations mix pressure and energy density with the off diagonal components of the energy-momentum tensor (of which kinetic energy of course gives a contribution to the energy density).
 
  • Like
Likes Gerald Kaiser
Thanks. I should have added that I meant the LOCAL temperature and pressure in a fluid that's not necessarily in (global) equilibrium. Would those be computed in the local rest frame? I understand the the relativistic character of temperature has been a controversial topic. Has some consensus developed around it?
 
OK, I figured it out. Due to its isotropy, p depends only on the average of v^2 and is, in fact, proportional to the average energy. The expression for the temperature in terms of the average energy is not derived independently but uses the equation of state to show that it, too is proportional to the average energy (at least for an ideal gas). So I was wrong to think Lorentz transformations would relate the two. Thanks for the help.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top