Are There Non-Rotating Objects in Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Rotation
AI Thread Summary
Celestial objects like planets, stars, and galaxies typically rotate due to initial conditions that create net torque, often from gravitational interactions. While most objects in space are in motion or rotating, there may be non-rotating objects in interstellar space that appear stationary from their own perspective but are moving in a straight line relative to outside observers. The discussion raises two key questions: whether the universe as a whole is rotating and if the total angular momentum of all mass in the universe is non-zero. The answers to these questions could have implications for our understanding of cosmic dynamics. The exploration of these concepts highlights the complexity of motion and rotation in the universe.
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
This question has most likely been asked already: Why do planets, stars, galaxies, and other celestial objects rotate? And why do planets/stars orbit other planets/stars. If an object is to start rotating, it must initially have some non-zero net torque. But who/what is providing this torque? Are there planets, stars, etc. somewhere in space that are not rotating or orbiting another body?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The rotation is the result of some imbalance in the initial conditions of most systems. For example, take two objects being drawn toward each other by gravity. As they approach one another two possibilities exist; they could head directly toward one another a perfect collision course, but this possibility is extremely remote. The other possibility is that the collision course is not perfect, and the two objects miss on the first pass. Still drawn to one another by gravity, each will "turn" sharply in the direction of the other, resulting in two objects circling one another.

It is a nearr certainty that there are objects in interstellar space that cannot rotate around a recognizable Center. These objects could be perceived as sitting still (from their own frame of reference), but it is far more likely that an outside observer will see them as "traveling in a straight line".
 
Last edited:
Are these two questions the same?

(1) Is the universe as a whole rotating?

(2) Is the sum of the angular momentum vectors for all mass in the universe non-zero?

If the answer to (1) is "yes," then is the rotation susceptible to discovery?

Jerry Abbott
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top