Are There Other Strange Division Patterns Besides Cancelling 6's?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores various division patterns where fractions simplify to the same value despite apparent complexity, specifically focusing on examples like 16/64, 166/664, and 1666/6664, all equating to 0.25. It highlights that these fractions maintain their value when both the numerator and denominator are multiplied by the same factor. The conversation also mentions similar patterns with other numbers, such as 19/95 and 26/65, suggesting a broader phenomenon in division. Participants consider the mathematical reasoning behind these patterns and the concept of canceling digits. Overall, the thread emphasizes the intriguing nature of these division relationships.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement




how come that 16/64=.25
166/664=.25
1666/6664=.25
and any 1then n number of sixes / the same number of sixes then 4 = .25
same thing with 19 / 95

is there other strange division patterns?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1 followed by n sixes) * 4 = (string of n sixes followed by 4)
 
\frac{166}{664} = \frac{16 * 13.75}{64 * 13.75} = \frac{16}{64} = \frac{1}{4}
\frac{1666}{6664} = \frac{16 * 104.375}{64 * 104.375} = \frac{16}{64} = \frac{1}{4}

You could probably show the same sort of thing is happening with 19/95, 199/995, and so on.

In all these examples the numerator and denominator of 16/64 are being multiplied by the same number, yielding a fraction that is equal to 16/64 = 1/4. Same with 19/95 and the others.
 
Several things like this. Consider 26/65 (or maybe even 49/98). Consider fractions like (10a+b)/(10b+c) = a/c or similar
 
Here's one I always liked-just cancel the 6's.
\frac{1\rlap{/}6}{\rlap{/}64} \;=\;\frac{1}{4}
:smile:
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top