Are These Astronomy Calculations Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter astronomystudent
  • Start date Start date
astronomystudent
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
1. Given that Arcturus has an apparent magnitude of -0.06 and an Absolute magnitude of -0.30, calculate its distance in parsec in light-years.
Answer = 11.17 parsecs & 36.4 light years

2. Given that Sirius has an apparent magnitude of -1.47 and a distance of 2.67 parsecs, what is the Absolute magnitude?
Answer = 1.39

3. Assume that a star has an Absolute Magnitude of -11.7 and a distance of 17-5 parsecs from our solar system, what would be the apparent magnitude as seen from Earth?
Answer = 22.86
 
Physics news on Phys.org
astronomystudent said:
3. Assume that a star has an Absolute Magnitude of -11.7 and a distance of 17-5 parsecs from our solar system, what would be the apparent magnitude as seen from Earth?
Answer = 22.86

The others are fine, but this one looks way off. Did you mean to type "17-5" parsecs?
 
No, sorry I typed it wrong. It's supposed to be: 1705. Thanks for catching that. Here are the rest of my answers, are the others correct?

1.) distance - 11.17 parsecs
36.41 light -years

2.) m = 1.39

3.) M = 22.86

4.) distance - 46.08 parsecs
150.302 light-years

5.) 2401 times greater than that of the Sun's using L = M^4
 
astronomystudent said:
3.) M = 22.86

Try this one again. The SDSS survey can see -11th magnitude objects at much more than 1.7 kpc and its limiting magnitudes are usually in the low 20s.


4.) distance - 46.08 parsecs
150.302 light-years

5.) 2401 times greater than that of the Sun's using L = M^4

Don't know what the questions were for these last two.
 
3.) m = -.54137808

Here are the other questions:

4.) If the Hubble Space Telescope measure a parallax angle of 0.0217 arcsec for a given star, how far away from us is it in parsecs and light-years?

5.) If a star has a mass seven times greater than our Sun, what is the luminosity of the star compared to our Sun?
 
astronomystudent said:
3.) m = -.54137808

Here are the other questions:

4.) If the Hubble Space Telescope measure a parallax angle of 0.0217 arcsec for a given star, how far away from us is it in parsecs and light-years?

5.) If a star has a mass seven times greater than our Sun, what is the luminosity of the star compared to our Sun?

They all look right, but in general, it's a bad idea to quote a lot of significant digits in astronomy. On that last problem, in particular, the mass-luminosity relationship is very approximate.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top