Are two electrons in an hydrogen orbital positionally dependent ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the positional dependence of two electrons in the 1s orbital of a hydrogen anion or neutral helium. Participants explore whether knowledge of one electron's position provides information about the other, and the implications of electron correlations beyond position, such as spin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether it is meaningful to discuss the positions of electrons in an orbital, given their probabilistic distribution.
  • One participant notes that while electrons cannot occupy the same position simultaneously due to the Pauli exclusion principle, there is a higher probability of them being farther apart than close together.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of the pair distribution function, suggesting that the instantaneous position of one electron does depend on the position of the other, with calculations possible for real wave functions.
  • Another participant argues that electrons can be at the same position if they have different spin coordinates, but emphasizes that for same-spin electrons, the probability of finding them at the same location is zero due to the anti-symmetry of the wave function.
  • There is a contention regarding the nature of the wave functions involved, with some asserting that in the case of two electrons in the 1s orbital, the spatial wave function is symmetric, while the spin wave function is anti-symmetric.
  • One participant mentions that in the Hartree-Fock approximation, the positions of the two electrons may be uncorrelated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of electron positions and correlations, with no consensus reached on the nature of their dependence or the interpretation of the wave functions involved.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include references to the Fermi hole and exchange-correlation effects, indicating complexities in electron interactions that are not fully resolved within the conversation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly in the behavior of electrons in atomic orbitals and the implications of their interactions.

xortdsc
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering if 2 electrons in an 1s-orbital of a hydrogen anion (or alternatively neutral helium) are positionally dependent. By that I mean if some knowledge about one electron's position would somewhat give knowledge about the other ? Or is it completely nonsense to talk about positions in an orbital as the electrons are distributed and never have a specific position at all (even theoretically) ? And if that is the case, are there other correlations besides position (similar to their spin which has to be opposite for the two electrons in the same orbital, so knowing one determines the other) ?

Thanks and cheers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, no, maybe, depends on what you mean by "positionally dependent" :smile:

The interactions between the two electrons are part of the Hamiltonian of the system; this Hamiltonian appears in Schrödinger's equation which we solve for the wave function of the system; this wave function gives us probability amplitudes for various observables, including the positions of the electrons.

Whether these positions are interesting (in the sense that they provide any useful insight into the behavior of the atom) is a different question, one that we can also ask about the ordinary single-electron hydrogen atom.
 
We know that the electrons can't be exactly at the same place at the same time (see Fermi hole), but apart from that you can only say that there is a higher probability of them being far apart than close together
 
To the OP: Yes, the instantaneous position of the second electron depends on the position of the first electron. For a given N-electron wave function [itex]\Phi[/itex], this property is described in the so called pair distribution function:
[tex]\rho(\vec x_1, \vec x_2)=\frac{\langle\Phi|\Psi^\dagger(\vec x_1)\Psi^\dagger(\vec x_2)\Psi(\vec x_2)\Psi(\vec x_1)|\Phi\rangle}{\langle\Phi|\Psi^\dagger(\vec x_1)\Psi(\vec x_1)|\Phi\rangle\langle\Phi|\Psi^\dagger(\vec x_2)\Psi(\vec x_2)|\Phi\rangle}[/tex]
where [itex]\Psi(\vec x)[/itex] are the 'wave operators' destroying a particle at a specific place, and [itex]\vec x_i=(\vec r_i, s_i)[/itex] are the electron's combined space/spin coordinates. This quantity, effectively, describes the probability of finding electrons at the places [itex]\vec x_1[/itex] and [itex]\vec x_2[/itex] simultaneously, divided by the probability of finding them there individually (the denominator is the product of the electron densities at x1/x2).

This quantity, the pair distribution function, can be calculated for real wave functions in real molecules, and it is most definitely not uniformly 1. However, it does approach 1.0 as the places x1 and x2 become farther separated in space, or as x1 and x2 belong to different atomic shells (e.g., core electrons are hardly displaced by nearby valence electrons).

To DrClaude: Electrons *CAN* be right on top of each other, as long as they have different spin coordinates[1]. The Fermi hole (here often called exchange-correlation hole) does not necessarily go down to 0.0. Indeed, in the high-density limit of the uniform electron gas (=low correlation limit), the correlation hole vanishes and only an exchange hole remains. That means that in this limit opposite spin electrons are effectively uncoupled.

[1] (they can't if they have the same spin coordinate; for same-spin electrons the pair distribution function is always 0 at zero inter-electronic distance, due to the anti-symmetry of the wave function. But this does not apply to different-spin-electrons).
 
cgk said:
To DrClaude: Electrons *CAN* be right on top of each other, as long as they have different spin coordinates[1]. The Fermi hole (here often called exchange-correlation hole) does not necessarily go down to 0.0. Indeed, in the high-density limit of the uniform electron gas (=low correlation limit), the correlation hole vanishes and only an exchange hole remains. That means that in this limit opposite spin electrons are effectively uncoupled.
The OP was asking about two electrons in the 1s orbital of a hydrogenic atom. In that case, the electrons can be found in a strictly anti-symmetric spatial wave function, for which the probability of finding the electrons at the same place is exactly 0.

My answer was too short and lacked some important details about what I was considering. Your answer was more complete.
 
DrClaude said:
The OP was asking about two electrons in the 1s orbital of a hydrogenic atom. In that case, the electrons can be found in a strictly anti-symmetric spatial wave function, for which the probability of finding the electrons at the same place is exactly 0.
If they are both in the 1s hydrogen orbital, then they are in a symmetric spatial wave function (they are both in the same spatial orbital). It is then the spin wave function which is anti-symmetric. So the chance of finding them at the same place is not zero for this case.

In the dominant single determinant (Hartree-Fock approximation), the positions of the two electrons are even entirely uncorrelated in this case.
 
thanks guys. that helps. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K