Area and volume calculation (no integration))

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
I can compute the area of the rectangle formed by Δx and Δy simply by product ΔxΔy.
image.png


Now, how can I to compute the area in gray given Δr and Δθ?
image.png


Also, I can to compute the volume of a parallelepiped formed by Δx, Δy and Δz, simply multiplicand ΔxΔyΔz. But, how can I compute the volume in shpherical coordinates formed by Δρ, Δφ and Δθ?

Convention:
image.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you know the radius then you can compute the wedge by computing the area of circles r and r+dr and an angle ratio dtheta/(2*pi) for dtheta measured in radians:

area(wedge) = area(circle(r+dr) - area(circle(r)) * (dtheta / 2*pi)

In spherical coordinates you have a more complicated situation where you could derive a formula for the 3D wedge using calculus.

If you're thinking the ancient greeks didn't know calculus so how did they algebraically arrive at the answer then
you need to read about their calculus precursor the method of exhaustion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_exhaustion

http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cass/courses/m446-03/exhaustion.pdf

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/HistTopics/The_rise_of_calculus.html
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top