Area enclosed between y^2=4-x and y=x-2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Nye_Fan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
Bill_Nye_Fan
Messages
31
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Please find attached

Homework Equations

[/B]
Definite integrals and area between two curves

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
Also find attached.

The answer in the back of the book says that part c should be 10/3, but that would mean that (8sqrt (2))/3 would need to cancel out in both area 2.1 and area 2.2, whichdoesn't work because areas are always positive.
20160610_103133.jpg
20160610_103219.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why didn't you calculate the area under the parabola and only subtract the triangle? It seems you used more areas than necessary. But I'm not good at reading on the side.
 
fresh_42 said:
Why didn't you calculate the area under the parabola and only subtract the triangle? It seems you used more areas than necessary. But I'm not good at reading on the side.
Ah yes that is a much better idea thank you. But still, my method should still be getting the same answer but it's not. Could you please explain to me where I'm going wrong?
 
Bill_Nye_Fan said:

Homework Statement


Please find attached

Homework Equations

[/B]
Definite integrals and area between two curves

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
Also find attached.

The answer in the back of the book says that part c should be 10/3, but that would mean that (8sqrt (2))/3 would need to cancel out in both area 2.1 and area 2.2, whichdoesn't work because areas are always positive.
View attachment 101868 View attachment 101869
Areas may always be positive, but definite integrals are not required to be positive. To calculate an area using a definite integral sometimes requires some interpretation of what the definite integral means in that case.

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/AreaBetweenCurves.aspx

Going off fresh_42's comment, you can also evaluate the definite integral to calculate the area under a curve using dy instead of dx as the variable of integration.
 
Bill_Nye_Fan said:
Ah yes that is a much better idea thank you. But still, my method should still be getting the same answer but it's not. Could you please explain to me where I'm going wrong?
To be honest: I didn't like the root expressions. First thing I did was to exchange x and y.
 
SteamKing said:
Going off fresh_42's comment, you can also evaluate the definite integral to calculate the area under a curve using dy instead of dx as the variable of integration.
In other words, using horizontal strips instead of vertical strips.
 
Thank you all for your help, but I feel like some of this stuff is a little beyond my current course. We've only just started looking at definite integrals, and have spent even less time with areas between two curves. I highly doubt we're expected to be using horizontal strips instead of vertical ones when we haven't even learned about conics or anything really.

But again thank you all for your help still
 
Bill_Nye_Fan said:
Thank you all for your help, but I feel like some of this stuff is a little beyond my current course. We've only just started looking at definite integrals, and have spent even less time with areas between two curves. I highly doubt we're expected to be using horizontal strips instead of vertical ones when we haven't even learned about conics or anything really.

But again thank you all for your help still
You don't need to know anything about conics to switch the variable of integration. Often times, switching is done as a matter of convenience to simplify the integral.
 
I think my main problem is that I still don't know how to calculate the area between two curves properly.

Say I was just given y=x-2 and y=-sqrt(4-x) and had to find the area enclosed between them between x=0 and x=2
Isn't the correct way of doing this to just set up an integral over the given domain and subtract the function on the bottom from the function in top? So integral(2, 0, (x-2-(-sqrt(4-x)))dx
 
  • #10
SteamKing said:
You don't need to know anything about conics to switch the variable of integration. Often times, switching is done as a matter of convenience to simplify the integral.
... or simply exchange x and y and integrate as you are used to, which is the same.
 
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
... or simply exchange x and y and integrate as you are used to, which is the same.
Okay thank you I'll just do it that way
 
Back
Top