Area of Ring Element: Puzzling Out dA

AI Thread Summary
The area of the shaded ring is derived from the formula dA = 2πρ dρ, where 2πρ represents the circumference and dρ is the infinitesimal thickness of the ring. This approach is valid because as dρ approaches zero, the inner and outer circumferences converge, allowing for the calculation of the area of the ring. The confusion arises from mistakenly applying the circumference to calculate the area of a full circle instead of the ring. The correct area of a circle with radius ρ is indeed πρ², not 2πρ². This method emphasizes the importance of using infinitesimal changes in calculus for accurate area calculations.
influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
7e807e.png

The circumference of the shaded ring is 2πρ however I am struggling to understand how the area, dA, of the ring is equal to (2πρ)dρ? I mean the circumference varies depending on the value of ρ so surely we can't multiply by dρ to yield the entire area of the shaded ring? If we decided to go by the method followed in the diagram above, then the area of the circle with radius ρ would be circumference*thickness = 2πρ(ρ) = 2πρ2 but this isn't correct as the area should be πρ2?

I know this is supposed to be simple but I am having a brain freeze and it just isn't clicking atm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ring is assumed to be of infinitesimal thickness. Here, thickness dρ is the infinitesimal change is the radius. Hence, as dρ→0, i.e.as dρ tends to 0, the inner circumference of the ring→the outer circumference i.e. area of the ring=2πρ⋅dρ.
 
influx said:
If we decided to go by the method followed in the diagram above, then the area of the circle with radius ρ would be circumference*thickness = 2πρ(ρ) = 2πρ2 but this isn't correct as the area should be πρ2?
This method is useful only when the "change" is very small, to be precise, "infinitesimal"(→0). This is a very common technique in calculus.
 
\int 2\pi \rho d\rho = \pi \rho^2
 
cnh1995 said:
The ring is assumed to be of infinitesimal thickness.

yes, you have to notice in the diagram that the width ['thickness'] of the ring is illustrated as dp.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top