Area under the curve in PV diagram

AI Thread Summary
The area under the curve in a PV diagram represents the work done during a gas process. The correct approach involves calculating the area of the trapezoid formed by the diagonal line connecting points (V1, P1) and (V2, P2) to the horizontal axis, rather than finding the difference between two rectangles. The initial method of calculating the area as the difference of rectangles is incorrect. Understanding the geometric representation of work in the PV diagram is crucial for solving related problems accurately. This clarification helps in correctly interpreting the graph and determining the work done.
jack1234
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Area under the curve in PV diagram(q35)

For this question:
http://tinyurl.com/37tqvp

What I do is to find the area of PV under the straight line, using
(area of bigger rectangle-area of smaller rectangle)/2
=((p2*v2)-(p1*v1))/2

but this is not one of the choices.

May I know how to solve this question correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jack1234 said:
What I do is to find the area of PV under the straight line, using (area of bigger rectangle-area of smaller rectangle)/2
=((p2*v2)-(p1*v1))/2
This is an incorrect interpretation of the graph.

The process takes the gas from (V1, P1) to (V2, P2) along the diagnonal line. The work is the area under that diagonal line, and not the area difference of the two boxes. One needs to find the area of the trapezoid between the diagonal line (V1, P1) to (V2, P2) and the abscissa.
 
Got it right, thanks:)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top