Area under v vs t sinusoidal trace

AI Thread Summary
To find the area under a sinusoidal voltage vs. time graph, integrating the squared waveform with respect to time is ideal, but without integration tools, the area can be considered proportional to Vrms. Vrms represents the effective value of AC voltage, equivalent to the DC voltage that produces the same heating effect in a resistor, calculated as 0.707 times the peak voltage. The relationship between the area under the curve and Vrms is not direct; it is proportional to both Vrms and Vpeak due to the sinusoidal nature of the waveform. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between AC voltage and power. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing the distinctions between Vrms, Vpeak, and their implications in circuit analysis.
lavster
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
if I have a sinusoidal trace on an oscilloscope (v vs t) and I wanted to find the area under the wave form squared graph I could integrate the sqaured waveform with respect to t.

but since i don't have the integration facility... is it fair to say that the area under the graph is proprtional to vrms^2 ?

im confused to what vrms is? the average v^2 value (i know its Vpeak/2)

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wiki has a pretty good article on rms

basically its 0.707 of the peak value
and from what I remember the rms power of an AC circuit ( average power) is the equivalent to the DC power
( did that make sense ?) :smile:

Dave
 
Last edited:
lavster said:
im confused to what vrms is? the average v^2 value (i know its Vpeak/2)
thanks

An AC voltage of 10 volts rms ( no matter whether it is sinusoidal or not ) means that this AC voltage will heat up a resistor as a DC voltage of 10 volts.

Remember that the power transformed into heat is V^2 / R.

basically its 0.707 of the peak value
in a sinusoidal wave.

.. is it fair to say that the area under the graph is proprtional to vrms^2 ?
No, it is proportional to Vrms an also proportional to Vpeak ( because it is a sinuoidal wave ).
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top