Argue, why given Operators are compact or not.

jonathan krill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Which of the operators T:C[0,1]\rightarrow C[0,1] are compact?

$$(i)\qquad Tx(t)=\sum^\infty_{k=1}x\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)\frac{t^k}{k!}$$ and
$$(ii)\qquad Tx(t)=\sum^\infty_{k=0}\frac{x(t^k)}{k!}$$

ideas for compactness of the operator:

- the image of the closed unit ball is relatively compact under T.
- for any sequence (x_n)\subset B_1(0), the sequence (T_nx) contains a cauchy sequence.
- show that the operator is not bounded, which is equivalent of it not being continuous which is necessary to be a compact operator
- show T(C[0,1]) is equicontinuous, and then argue via arzela-ascoli to get compactness of the operator
- obviously they are somehow related to e^t

sorry read the sticky to late, pls some moderator move this to HW forum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moved to homework. @jonathan krill have you made any attempts at a solution? You give some ideas for showing compactness, but have you tried any of them? If so, please post what you obtained. (Note that in homework threads you are supposed to fill out the homework template; part of that is showing your attempts at a solution.)
 
made progress showing (i) is compact the T_nx are polynomials of finite rank, so for sequences in C[0,1] T_nx is bounded hence T_nx contains a convergent subsequence. hence T is compact.

for (ii) One probably can show that T_nx is not cauchy using x(t)=t^n
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top