Associative, Commutative, and Distributive Laws for Congruence Classes

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the associative, commutative, and distributive properties of addition and multiplication for congruence classes of integers. Participants are exploring the relationship between these properties in the context of integer operations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering whether the properties of integers directly imply the same properties for congruence classes. There is an attempt to establish commutativity through definitions and examples, questioning if the approach taken is correct.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to formally approach the proof, suggesting starting from definitions and considering set inclusions to demonstrate equality. There is recognition that while the properties may seem trivial, a formal proof is necessary.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that a congruence class is distinct from an integer, which raises questions about the assumptions underlying the properties being discussed.

bologna121121
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are supposed to prove that the addition and multiplication of congruence classes for integers are associative, commutative, and distributive.


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


To me, it seems like this would just be trivial as all these properties follow from the fact that we are working with integers, and integers are associative, commutative, and distributive (with both addition and multiplication). Am I on the right track here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bologna121121 said:
To me, it seems like this would just be trivial as all these properties follow from the fact that we are working with integers, and integers are associative, commutative, and distributive (with both addition and multiplication). Am I on the right track here? Thanks.
It is fairly trivial, but you still need to show it. A congruence class of integers is not the same thing as an integer. What do you have so far?
 
I think I have the idea of what to do, but just to be sure I'll try the commutative addition one.

The addition is commutative if [itex]\overline{a}[/itex] + [itex]\overline{b}[/itex] = [itex]\overline{b}[/itex] + [itex]\overline{a}[/itex]

This is the same condition as x + y = y + x for all x [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\overline{a}[/itex] and all y [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\overline{b}[/itex] where a,b,x,y are all integers.

Thus, because for any integers x and y, x + y = y + x (commutativity of integers under addition) we would have [itex]\overline{a}[/itex] + [itex]\overline{b}[/itex] = [itex]\overline{b}[/itex] + [itex]\overline{a}[/itex]

Is this more or less the correct approach to take here?
 
That's more or less right. If you want to be more formal, you might start from the definitions:
$$\overline{a} + \overline{b} = \{x + y : x \in \overline{a}, y \in \overline{b}\}$$
$$\overline{b} + \overline{a} = \{y + x : x \in \overline{a}, y \in \overline{b}\}$$
To show equality of two sets, we show that each contains the other, i.e. ##\overline{a} + \overline{b} \subseteq \overline{b} + \overline{a}## and ##\overline{b} + \overline{a} \subseteq \overline{a} + \overline{b}##. To show the first inclusion, take an arbitrary element of ##\overline{a} + \overline{b}##. By definition, it is of the form ##x + y## with ##x \in \overline{a}## and ##y \in \overline{b}##. By commutativity of integer addition, ##x + y = y + x##, and the right hand side is clearly an element of ##\overline{b} + \overline{a}##. The reverse inclusion is similar.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K