Astronaut-Satellite Separation Calculation

AI Thread Summary
An 80.0 kg astronaut pushes off a 620 kg satellite with a force of 100 N for 0.590 seconds, raising questions about the separation distance after 1.20 seconds. The problem involves Newton's third law, as the astronaut's push results in an equal and opposite reaction from the satellite. To solve it, one should apply conservation of energy to determine the work done and how it translates into kinetic energy, while also considering momentum conservation. Units must be included for clarity, and the time period of 0.590 seconds is crucial for calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing work to arrive at the final answer.
sunbunny
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I have no idea how to start this problem:

An 80.0 spacewalking astronaut pushes off a 620 satellite, exerting a 100 force for the 0.590 it takes him to straighten his arms.How far apart are the astronaut and the satellite after 1.20 ?

I know that it involves Newton's 3rd law since the astronaut is applying a force onto the satellite and in turn the satellite pushes back on the astronaut to cause him to move but other that that I'm confused how to solve this problem. If anyone can give me some feedback that would be great!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you *must* include units with all of the numbers you list. They are meaningless otherwise.

Next, use conservation of energy to solve it. What work does the astronaut perform in the push? How does that convert into KE? And remember that conservation of momentum will also factor in.
 
Your are correct, Newton's third law is crucial here, but one must also consider Newton's second law, or more specifically the impulse-momentum theorem.

Edit: Berkeman got there first :wink: Is the 0.590 a distance or a time period?
 
sorry about forgetting the units.
An 80.0 kg spacewalking astronaut pushes off a 620kg satellite, exerting a 100N force for the 0.590s it takes him to straighten his arms.How far apart are the astronaut and the satellite after 1.20s ?
 
So now go ahead and use the work/KE/momentum stuff and Hootenanny's suggestion. Show your work -- what answer do you get?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top