Astronomical Lens Telescope Problem - Angular Magnification

AI Thread Summary
A convex lens forms an image of 8.96 mm on a screen, and after moving the lens 15.4 cm, a new image of 3.54 cm is observed. The relationship between object distance (u), image distance (v), and focal length (f) is described by the lens formula 1/f = 1/u + 1/v. The discussion highlights the need to maintain the fixed distances between the object and screen while adjusting the lens position, leading to the equations u2 = u1 + 15.4 and v2 = v1 - 15.4. Participants express confusion over solving for the focal length, with one suggesting that the sum of u and v remains constant, indicating the importance of understanding the lens's positioning relative to the focal point.
AXidenT
Messages
26
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A convex lens forms an image 8.96 mm on a screen. Keeping the screenand the object fixed, the lens is moved through a distance of 15.4 cm and a sharp image of the object is again observed on the screen. If the length of the second image is 3.54 cm, calculate the focal length of the lens.

Homework Equations



1/f = 1/u + 1/v

M = v/u = Hi/Ho

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi1 = 0.896, Hi2 = 3.54

u2 = u1 + 15.4, v2 = v1 - 15.4 (Could be plus or minus for both).

1/u1 = 0.896/Ho

=> v2/u2 = 3.54/Ho = (v1-15.4)/(u1+15.4)

=> 1/(u1+15.4) + 1/(v1-15.4) = 1/u1 + 1/u2

I've tried solving from there, but always end up with negatives or weird answers. The book's answer was 10.3. Any hints or help please? :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AXidenT said:

Homework Equations



1/f = 1/u + 1/v

M = v/u = Hi/Ho

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi1 = 0.896, Hi2 = 3.54

u2 = u1 + 15.4, v2 = v1 - 15.4

Think: the object and the screen are fixed at a distance, say D. What do you know about the sum of object distance and image distance, u+v?
The image is real in both cases. Where is the object with respect to the focal point?
The first image is much smaller than the second one. When is the object farther from the lens?

ehild
 
Well from that you could say uv/D = f

Both u and v > f.

The greater v is compared to u, the greater the magnification. As a result you could say v2 = v1+15.4 and u2 = u1-15.4

u1v1/D = (v1+15.4)(u1-15.4)/D => u1v1 = (v1+15.4)(u1-15.4) = u1v1 - 15.4v1 + 15.4v1 - 237.16

=> (237.16 + 15.4v1)/15.4 = u1

v1/u1 = 0.896/Ho = v1/((237.16 + 15.4v1)/15.4) => Ho = 0.896/v1/((237.16 + 15.4v1)/15.4)

(v1+15.4)/(u1-15.4) = 3.54/Ho = (v1+15.4)/(((237.16 + 15.4v1)/15.4)-15.4)

3.54/0.896/v1/((237.16 + 15.4v1)/15.4) = (v1+15.4)/(((237.16 + 15.4v1)/15.4)-15.4)

I think when solved that gets me a -ve value for v... :S

Is that even on the right track at all? It's down to one equation with one variable but woah... I'm starting to confuse myself I think. :P

I'll have another try after some electrical questions I think...

Thank you.
 
AXidenT said:
Well from that you could say uv/D = f

NO! The object and the screen are fixed and the lens is in between. So what can you say about the sum of v and u?

ehild
 

Attachments

  • shiftlens2.JPG
    shiftlens2.JPG
    5.2 KB · Views: 500
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top