At What Distance Does the Sun Become Invisible to the Human Eye?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UMich1344
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
UMich1344
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Sensing Light at Great Distances

Homework Statement



In perfect darkness, human eyes might be able to sense a point source of light if roughly 10 photons/second strike the retinas. The sun, which is currently 1.5 x 10^11 meters from earth, emits about 10^45 photons/second. Assuming that the pupils of a pair of eyes have a combined area of 1.0 square centimeters, at what distance would the sun become invisible to the unaided human eyes?

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



?


I've been given this problem in my physics class and have absolutely no clue as to what step needs to be taken first. There are more parts to this question, but figuring out the distance is the first thing that needs to be done. Can anybody offer me any hints as to what I can do to solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine a big sphere of radius R around the sun. How many photons are passing through it each second? (Hint: no calculation need be done here, and the answer does not depend on R.)

OK, now, how many are passing through each square centimeter on the surface of this sphere? (This DOES depend on R.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top