Atmospheric Density - Equation to Model from Sea Level to 200km

AI Thread Summary
An equation for modeling atmospheric density from sea level to 200 km is given by P=(Patm)*e^(-Mgh/RT) and D=PM/RT, though it assumes constant temperature and provides only rough estimates. Higher altitudes exhibit significant variability in density due to factors like solar activity. Alternative approaches include using an exponential curve fit, such as P = P0 * exp(ah^3 + bh^2 + h), for better accuracy. Various standard atmospheres, like US and ICAO models, offer insights into pressure and temperature changes with altitude, albeit with limitations. For practical modeling, utilizing tools like Excel for graphing data is recommended.
ZachWeiner
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey, does anyone have an equation that roughly models atmospheric density from sea level to about 200 km up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's not much of an equation for atmospheric pressure that's simple. If you have a CRC handbook you could look up a few values. You should know, as well, that it's quit variable at higher altitudes, dependent on solar activity.
 
Hi ZachWeiner,
Pressure at a height "h" is given by :
P=(Patm)*e^(-Mgh/RT) [Patm is the pressure at sea level]
And D=PM/RT
But there is an assumption that T is const. this formula will only enable you to calculate the density roughly. So do not use it if you want accurate answers.
 
aniketp said:
Hi ZachWeiner,
Pressure at a height "h" is given by :
P=(Patm)*e^(-Mgh/RT) [Patm is the pressure at sea level]
And D=PM/RT
But there is an assumption that T is const. this formula will only enable you to calculate the density roughly. So do not use it if you want accurate answers.

I have no excuse for it, but in response to this question, I actually tried an exponential curve of pressure vs. height, and fit it to two points of data; sea level and 100 Km. It was off by 28% at 50 Km. Very disappointing.

To get a decent curve fit, P = P0 * exp(ah^3 + bh^2 + h) might do it.
 
what do you need to model it for? pretty much any fluid mechanics text will tell you in a table at the back.

lol.. if u really want to model it, put all the numbers into excel and graph it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top