Atomic Form Factor: Finding f(|G|) with λ & θ

  • Thread starter Thread starter anon134
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Form
anon134
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Let -Q charge be uniformly distributed over a sphere radius R. Find f(|\vec{G}|), the atomic form factor.
2. Let the incident xrays have wavelength \lambda, determine the dependence of f(|\vec{G}|) on \theta, the scattering angle.

Homework Equations



f(|\vec{G}|)=\int_0^{\infty} \rho(r) e^{i \vec{G} \cdot \vec{r}} dr


The Attempt at a Solution



\rho(r) = -Q \delta (r-R)

\vec{G} \cdot \vec{r} =\vec{G} \cdot r \hat{r} = |G||r| cos(\theta)

f(|\vec{G}|)=\int_0^{\infty} -Q \delta (r-R) e^{i |G|r cos(\theta)} dr

My instinct would be just to say:

f(|\vec{G}|)=-Q e^{i |G|R cos(\theta)}

But this leaves the term to be imaginary. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone have any thoughts?
 
Well, your calculation is correct from what I can see. What is the problem with an complex form factor?

Torquil
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top