Attract Electrons with Protons: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student j
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Protons
student j
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
:zzz: :confused: :confused: I would like to know if you can create a false but almost irrisitable ground in which electons have an attraction like a magnet. For example if it were to lightning outside I would like to create a charge in which the electricty thinks my path chosen is path of least resistance. It is to my understanding that when an atom is consumed by more protons than electrons, and an atom consumed with more electrons than protons get near each other they equal out. Due to theory on how opposites attract can you create a irrisistable nonstop transfer, and a nonstop production of positve charged atoms which in turn swap out there positve buddies into negative electrons when other atoms are introduced. In Lamens terms ( Boys meets girl, girl likes boy more than any boy in the world.) In which case would it be possible to sort of trick electrons into thinking that a group of atoms are consumed with more protons at one location all the time.:eek: :smile: :bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um, no. That doesn't work that way. Lightning interaction with the ground is complex and the electric current does follow the path of least resistance, or greatest conduction. But that also has to do with the charge distributions and potentials involved.

It is to my understanding that when an atom is consumed by more protons than electrons, and an atom consumed with more electrons than protons get near each other they equal out.
Atoms contain protons (and neutrons) in the nucleus and electrons surround the nucleus in a number that usually balances the nuclear charge, i.e. maintains charge neutrality outside the atom. Protons do not move freely like electrons. One has to look at molecules and compounds which have different binding strengths on their electrons. Some materials, like metals, are great conductors of electricity since their electrons are very mobile, while cermamics, particularly metal oxides are great insulators, i.e. have high resistance to electrical current since their electrons are bound (much less mobile) in molecular bonds (orbits).
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top