Atwood's machine with two connected discs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration and linear accelerations of two connected discs with different masses and radii. The user attempts to derive the equations governing the system's motion but encounters difficulties in their approach. Key equations involving forces, torques, and relationships between linear and angular accelerations are mentioned, but the user's formulation is deemed incorrect. A suggestion is made to establish three separate force equations for each hanging mass and the disc, integrating the relationships between angular and linear accelerations for a correct solution. Clarification on the derivation process is requested to address the user's confusion.
lukast
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The system looks like this:
image.jpg

I have two discs which are connected.
Disc 1 has ##R_1##(radius) and ##M_1##(mass)
Disc 2 has ##R_2## and ##M_2##
## R_2 > R_1 ##
## M_2 > M_1 ##

on both discs weights are attached on opposite sides.
On smaller ##m_1## is pulling and on bigger ##m_2##

##m_2 > m_1##

i need to calculate angular acceleration and accelerations of both weights

Homework Equations


[/B]
## F = m * a ##
## \alpha = \frac{a}{R} ##
## M = I * \alpha ##
## Q = m * g ##

The Attempt at a Solution



The force that would cause acceleration of system is equal to :

## F = Q_2 - Q_1 ##
## F = m_2*g - m_1*g ##

The force that will cause tangential acceleration of discs would be equal to :

## I * \alpha = M ##
## \frac{1}{2} m * R^2 * \frac{a}{R} = F * R ##
## \frac{1}{2}*m * a = F ##
Now we know that Disc 2 and ##m_2## will have the same accelerations and Disc 1 and ##m_1## will have the same accelerations. We also now that Disc 1 and Disc 2 also have same angular acceleration. So from that i thought i can write this:

## a_1*(\frac{1}{2} * M_1 + m_1) + a_2(\frac{1}{2}*M_2 + m_2) = F ## (force that cause acceleration)

## a = \alpha * R##

##\alpha * R_1 *(\frac{1}{2} * M_1 + m_1) + \alpha * R_2 *(\frac{1}{2}*M_2 + m_2) = F##

and i have everything to get an alpha but its wrong

if somebody solve this on different way, could please explain why is my approach wrong
[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lukast said:
## a_1*(\frac{1}{2} * M_1 + m_1) + a_2(\frac{1}{2}*M_2 + m_2) = F ## (force that cause acceleration)
Can you explain how you derived this?

I suggest you set up three force equations: one for each hanging mass and one for the disk. You can combine those equations, adding what you know about the relationships between the angular and linear accelerations.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top