MHB Automorphisms, Galois Groups & Splitting Fields

mathjam0990
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let f(x)=x4-2x2+9
Find the splitting field and Galois group for f(x) over ℚ

Here is what I have written out so far. If I have found the splitting field E correctly, have I proceeded with the Gal(E/F) group correctly?

Also, how would I go about finding the roots of this equation by hand without a calculator?

If anyone could help me out with the answer and a detailed explanation to follow that would be very helpful. Thank you.

View attachment 5498
 

Attachments

  • ab alg.jpg
    ab alg.jpg
    67.4 KB · Views: 95
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, you've found the roots, that's good.

To know the degree of the splitting field over $\Bbb Q$, we need to know if $h(x)$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$.

We know that $h(x)$ has no linear factors in $\Bbb Q[x]$ (since none of the roots are rational), and thus also no rational cubic factors. Does it have any quadratic factors in $\Bbb Q[x]$?

If $h(x) = (x^2 + ax + b)(x^2 + cx + d)$ we have:

$a+c = 0$
$ac + b + d = -2$
$ad + bc = 0$
$bd = 9$.

So $c = -a$, and the third equation becomes $a(d - b) = 0$. Thus either $a = 0$, or $b = d$.

If $a = c = 0$, then the second equation is $b+d = -2$. Since $d = \dfrac{9}{b}$, we get:

$b + \dfrac{9}{b} = -2$, that is:

$b^2 - 2b + 9 = 0$. Checking the discriminant: $4 - 36 = -32 < 0$, we see this has no real, thus no rational, solutions.

Thus $b = \pm 3$. Substituting back in equation 2, either:

$-a^2 - 6 = -2 \implies a^2 = -4$ (for $b = -3$) , this is impossible;

$-a^2 + 6 = -2 \implies a^2 = 8$ (for $b = 3$), which has no rational solution, as $8$ is not a perfect square.

So we conclude that $h(x)$ is indeed irreducible, as its roots are all distinct it is separable, so the splitting field has degree $4 = \text{deg }h$ over $\Bbb Q$.

As this splitting field (let's call it $E$) is Galois (being a splitting field), we see that $|\text{Gal}(E/\Bbb Q)| = 4$.

So we are looking for a group of automorphisms of $E$, that fix $\Bbb Q$, of order $4$.

Now it should be clear that $E \subseteq \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i)$, since the roots of $h$ are contained in the latter field.

Furthermore, by factoring $h$ over the reals, we see that:

$h(x) = (x^2 + 2\sqrt{2}x + 3)(x^2 - 2\sqrt{2}x + 3)$.

Since $i \not\in \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$, and $i$ is a root of $x^2 + 1 \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})[x]$, we see that:

$[\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})] = 2$, and clearly $[\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}:\Bbb Q] = 2$, thus:

$[\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i):\Bbb Q] = [\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})][\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}:\Bbb Q] = 4$.

Since $[E:\Bbb Q] = 4$, as well, we see that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i)$ *is* $E$.

Complex-conjugation clearly gives us an element of $\text{Gal}(E/\Bbb Q)$ of order $2$ which fixes the subfield $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$.

The map: $\sqrt{2} \mapsto -\sqrt{2}, i \mapsto i$ also gives us an automorphism of order 2, so we conclude the Galois group is the Klein 4-group.

As far as "finding the roots by hand", since $h(x)$ is a bi-quadratic (a quadratic in $x^2$), it's really pretty easy:

Solve $y^2 - 2x + 9$ for $y$ by using the quadratic formula.

Sub $x^2$ in for $y$, and then solve the resulting two quadratics (you'll need to know how to take the square root of a complex number),

OR: solve the two (real) quadratics I found up above.
 
Very helpful information, thank you!...if I could ask one more question, say we have the polynomial x4+x3+x2+x+1 and we wanted to find a splitting field over ℚ. Could we approach this by recognizing that this is the minimum polynomial of Φ5(x) thus root ϑ = e2πi/5. So the minimum polynomial is (x-ϑ)(x-ϑ2)(x-ϑ3)(x-ϑ4) and because ϑ↦ϑk for k=1,2,3,4 then E = ℚ[e2πi/5] ? Thank you.
 
The phrase "minimum polynomial of $\Phi_5(x)$" makes no sense. It *is* the minimal polynomial of $e^{2\pi i/5}$, and the reason is that $\Phi_n(x)$ is irreducible for every $n \in \Bbb Z^+$. It's a non-trivial proof to show this for arbitrary $n$, but you can use a clever substitution to show it for $n = p$, a prime, so that you can apply the Eisenstein Criterion.

And yes, the splitting field is indeed $\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)$, where $\zeta_5 = e^{2\pi i/5}$ (the other roots are all powers of $\zeta_5$-in fact, the powers of $\zeta_5$ (including $1$) are a cyclic group of order 5, and the Galois group of $x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1$ is a cyclic group of order $4$, generated by the automorphism:

$\sigma:\zeta_5 \mapsto (\zeta_5)^2$

($\zeta_5 \mapsto (\zeta_5)^3$ also works).

Interestingly enough, since $\text{Gal}(\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)/\Bbb Q) \cong \Bbb Z_4$, it has a unique subgroup of order 2, and thus we have a unique subfield of $\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)$ of degree (dimension) 2 over the rationals.

Can you guess what this field might be? (Here is a helpful hint: $\sigma^2$ is complex-conjugation restricted to $\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)$, so how would you find real quadratic factors of $x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1$?).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top