Autonomous System Summation: What is the sum of X1 + X2 + ... to infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arentmuskets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the infinite series sum of two recursive sequences defined by constants a, b, c, and d, all between -1 and 0. The user initially struggled with approximating the sum but later realized the problem can be approached using linear algebra and matrix equations. The correct formulation involves expressing the sums of X and Y in terms of each other, leading to a solvable equation. Ultimately, the user derived the final expression for the sum of X, confirming its accuracy through testing. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding geometric series and matrix power series in solving such problems.
arentmuskets
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This problem came up in a project I'm doing for work, and I don't have a very extensive math background so I don't know how to solve it. I would appreciate any help you guys could give me.

X1 is a constant
Y1 is a constant

Xn = aXn-1 + bYn-1
Yn = cXn-1 + dYn-1

For all n, for some constants a,b,c,d (for my purposes, all between -1 and 0).

What is the sum X1 + X2 + ... to infinity?

I've tried summing it like an infinite series:
(1/(1-a))(x+b((1/(1-d)y + cx))

That gives me a (poor) approximation, but not the exact answer :-(.

Thank you so much for your help in advance!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can rewrite the equation as follows...

Xn = (a + b)Xn-1
Xn = cXn-1

...where c = a + b. Note that every term is equal to the previous term multiplied by a constant, making this a geometric series, which only converges if |c| < 1. Any calculus textbook will discuss dealing with geometric series; the sum is given by...

Sum = \frac{X_{1}}{1 - c}
 
I think i might have written it wrong. Xn is a function of both Xn-1 AND Yn-1. I've corrected the mistake in my post.

I think it makes it a lot more complicated than a simple infinite series.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys! I could still use some help.

The logic I've been working on goes like this:

1/(1-a) (x) = x + ax +a2x + ...

1/(1-a) (x + by) = x + by + a2x + aby ...

Which covers some, but not all of the terms created when you solve the problem by hand.

I'm thinking it might be something like:

\sumX = 1/(1-a) ( x + bYn-1 )
\sumYn-1 = 1/(1-d) (y + cXn-2)

But I don't know how to express Xn-2 in terms of Xn.

Please help! (or point me in the right direction)
 
To me, its simpler to look at it as a linear algebra problem. The recurrences amount to the matrix equation:

\begin{pmatrix} X_n \\ Y_n \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d \end{pmatrix} ^ n \begin{pmatrix} x_0 \\ y_0 \end{pmatrix}

For S_n = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i and T_n = \sum_{i=1}^n Y_i

\begin{pmatrix} S_n \\ T_n \end{pmatrix} = \sum_{i=1}^n \begin{pmatrix} a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d \end{pmatrix}^i \begin{pmatrix} x_0 \\ y_0 \end{pmatrix}

To sum the matrix power series, we can try to find a matrix B such that

\begin{pmatrix} a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d \end{pmatrix} = B^{-1} \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \lambda_2 \end{pmatrix} B

Then

\begin{pmatrix} S_n \\ T_n \end{pmatrix} = B^{-1} ( \sum_{i=1}^n \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \lambda_2 \end{pmatrix}^i ) B \begin{pmatrix} x_0 \\ y_0 \end{pmatrix}

= B^{-1} \begin{pmatrix} \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_1^i &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_2^i \end{pmatrix} B \begin{pmatrix} x_0 \\ y_0 \end{pmatrix}
 
Thanks for the solution, Stephen!

I actually cracked it yesterday by myself. My original logic turned out to be right:

Since all terms in Xn-1 will be multiplied by a in Xn, we know that every term will be multiplied by a each step into infinity. Furthermore, we know that all new terms in X will come from b\Sigmay (and the original X1. Therefore we know:

\sum X=\frac{1}{1-a}\left ( x_{1}+b\sum Y \right )

By the same logic:

\sum Y=\frac{1}{1-d}\left ( y_{1}+c\sum X \right )

Now, if we plug \Sigmay into the formula for \Sigmax, and solve for \Sigmax, and then do some algebra, we get:

\sum X=\frac{by_{1}+x_{1}-dx_{1}}{\left ( 1-d \right )\left ( 1-a \right )-bc}

Which turns out to be right, after I tested it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top