Average Velocity vs. Instantaneous Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between average velocity and instantaneous velocity in uniformly accelerated motion. It explains that average velocity is calculated as the slope over an interval, while instantaneous velocity is the slope at a specific point. The linear nature of the acceleration graph indicates that the average velocity from time t1 to t2 equals the instantaneous velocity at the midpoint. Derivation of formulas is deemed unnecessary for this explanation. The conversation highlights the fundamental concepts of velocity in physics without requiring complex calculations.
crazyecto
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The graph below shows a plot of velocity vs. time for an object undergoing uniformly accelerated motion. The object has instantaneous velocity v1 at time t1 and instantaneous velocity v2 at time t2. Use the graph and the fact that, when the acceleration is constant, the average velocity can be written as vavg = (v1 + v2)/2 to explain how we know that the instantaneous velocity at the midpoint time is equal to vavg on the interval.

V = Vo + at

X - Xo = Vot + .5at2

v2 = vo2 + 2a(X - Xo)

X - Xo = .5(Vo + V)t

Now I know the answer has to do with some how deriving one of these formulas to get it to equal the formula for average veolcity but I can't seem to remember how. I think you some how take the derivative of X - Xo = .5(Vo + V)t to get the answer maybe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What graph?
 
pretty sure I know what the graph looks like cause I just had this problem in a homework lol.

This answer doesn't require any deriving. Average velocity is simply the slope of the velocity over a certain interval, and instantaneous velocity is the slope at a certain point on the interval. We know that the acceleration graph is simply the graph of the slope of the velocity function.The slope of this graph is clearly linear. And because average velocity and instantaneous velocity are just values of the slope over their intervals or at certain points, if we take the average velocity from t1 to t2 it would be the same as the velocity at the midpoint between t1 and t2.

Hopefully that makes some sense.
 
Last edited:
Stryder_SW said:
pretty sure I know what the graph looks like cause I just had this problem in a homework lol.

This answer doesn't require any deriving. Average velocity is simply the slope of the velocity over a certain interval, and instantaneous velocity is the slope at a certain point on the interval. We know that the acceleration graph is simply the graph of the slope of the velocity function.The slope of this graph is clearly linear. And because average velocity and instantaneous velocity are just values of the slope over their intervals or at certain points, if we take the average velocity from t1 to t2 it would be the same as the velocity at the midpoint between t1 and t2.

Hopefully that makes some sense.

you do realize that s/he posted this over a year ago, and probably doesn't need it anymore
 
mmmm no unfortunately I did not realize that...this was a colossal waste of time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top