Avg. Acceleration of ball against a wall with two velocities

  • Thread starter shizupple
  • Start date
  • #1
20
0
I searched the forum before posting and couldnt seem to find anything on the acceleration off a wall that wasnt dealing with force as well.


Homework Statement


A tennis ball with a velocity of +9.6 m/s to the right is thrown perpendicularly at a wall. After striking the wall, the ball rebounds in the opposite direction with a velocity of -5.2 m/s (to the left). If the ball is in contact with the wall for 0.008 s, what is the average acceleration of the ball while it is in contact with the wall?

Vi=9.6m/s
Vf=-5.2m/s
t=.008s


Homework Equations


Aavg = Vf-Vi / Tf-Ti
Vf = Vi+a(Tf-Ti)


The Attempt at a Solution


9.6-5.2 / .008 = 550 m/s^2 left ???
I realize that answer is nowhere close to correct. I must be using an incorrect formula because its dealing with the wall. If anyone could guide me to a correct formula that would be awesome! :smile:
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,187
5
The answer is actually correct (unless the book says it isn't). Collisions produce a large amount of force that varies through a small interval of time (this, I think, could be modeled under the Dirac delta). However, the force varies throughout the time interval, so the acceleration upon leaving the wall is probably not 550 m/s^2; this value, however, looks to be the average acceleration across the time interval (which is what you're asked for).

If you want to look this sort of thing up under the forums or anywhere else, it would usually fall under impulse or momentum.
 
  • #3
20
0
Hmm well i tried entering 550 (m/s^2) left (on webassign) and it said the 550 was wrong but the direction was correct? I just dont see how it can be accelerating at 550 m/s^2 when it is pretty much in contact with the wall?
 
  • #4
1,187
5
Sorry about that - I didn't do the math so I overlooked it...your method is correct, but remember that the final velocity is in the opposite direction of the initial, so the two values should have opposite signs. It looks like the actual answer is even larger than 550m/s^2.

Hmm well i tried entering 550 (m/s^2) left (on webassign) and it said the 550 was wrong but the direction was correct? I just dont see how it can be accelerating at 550 m/s^2 when it is pretty much in contact with the wall?

Try to think of the amount of force needed to send a ball coming at you at 10m/s in the opposite direction with a speed of 6m/s all in the range of .008s.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
20
0
we havent talked about force yet. i'm in a high school honors physics class. there shouldnt need to be anything dealing with force in this problem though should there? its just acceleration? and are you saying i need to change the sign on the 550 or i need to do (9.6+5.2)/.008 = 1850? And the time interval is not .008s, that is the time it is in contact with the wall.
 
  • #6
1,187
5
we havent talked about force yet. i'm in a high school honors physics class. there shouldnt need to be anything dealing with force in this problem though should there? its just acceleration? and are you saying i need to change the sign on the 550 or i need to do (9.6+5.2)/.008 = 1850? And the time interval is not .008s, that is the time it is in contact with the wall.

(9.6+5.2)/.008 = 1850 - this is right (and the direction is to the left). Just know that the ball accelerated from 9.6m/s in one direction to 5.2m/s in the opposite direction in a time interval of .008s.
 
  • #7
20
0
Wow! This is amazing. I would have never thought that was right. Thats crazy to think that its accelerating at 1850 m/s^2 in .008s. Thanks for your help!
 
  • #8
66
0
Wow! This is amazing. I would have never thought that was right. Thats crazy to think that its accelerating at 1850 m/s^2 in .008s. Thanks for your help!

Why wouldn't it be (-5.2m/s - 9.6m/s)/(.008s)= -1850m/s/s. The negative tells you it's to the left. Am I wrong for thinking this way?
 
  • #9
1,187
5
Why wouldn't it be (-5.2m/s - 9.6m/s)/(.008s)= -1850m/s/s. The negative tells you it's to the left. Am I wrong for thinking this way?

You're doing it the more precise way...though it is relatively the same as saying 1850m/s/s to the left (the negative indicates to the left).
 
  • #10
360
3
hello shizupple!! i read through the post and in the 1st post you said acceleration off the wall. personally i think its the wrong concept if you are using projectile motion to solve this problem. I think the question is trying to ask something like F=I/t where I is impluse. Although you get the same answer but i believe that is the correct concept just my 20c ::biggrin::
 
  • #11
20
0
hello shizupple!! i read through the post and in the 1st post you said acceleration off the wall. personally i think its the wrong concept if you are using projectile motion to solve this problem. I think the question is trying to ask something like F=I/t where I is impluse. Although you get the same answer but i believe that is the correct concept just my 20c ::biggrin::

Oh ok. Well we havent talked about any of that yet. I'm just in a high school honors physics class.
 

Related Threads on Avg. Acceleration of ball against a wall with two velocities

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
642
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Top