Avogadro's Theory: Molecules & Atoms Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter temaire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
AI Thread Summary
Avogadro's Theory relates the number of molecules and atoms in a chemical equation by establishing that one mole of a substance, represented by Avogadro's number (6.022 x 10^23), can consist of either atoms (for elements) or molecules (for compounds). In a balanced chemical equation, the coefficients indicate the ratio of moles, which directly translates to the number of molecules or atoms involved in the reaction. For example, in the reaction Si + O2 → SiO2, one mole of silicon reacts with one mole of oxygen to produce one mole of silicon dioxide, illustrating the relationship between moles and molecules. Additionally, Avogadro's principle states that equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain an equal number of molecules, allowing predictions about gas reactions based on their volumes. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering stoichiometry and gas behavior in chemistry.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question might sound confusing, because my teacher said it only once, and I don't think I have it down right. So if the question is confusing but you know what I'am trying to get at, please say so. The question is: According to Avogadro's Theory, how are the number of molecules and atoms related in a chemical equation?


Homework Equations


I don't think equations are necessary.


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that the number of molecules would be the same as the number of atoms in a chemical equation, but I'am not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I understand your question

Avogadro's number = 6.022 x 10^23 "things" = 1 mole

1.the "things" may be ATOMS if the substance is an ELEMENT

so 6.022 x 10^23 "ATOMS" = 1 mole of an ELEMENT

2. the "things" may be MOLECULES if the substance is a COMPOUND (molecular to be precise)

so 6.022 x 10^23 "MOLECULES" = 1 mole of an COMPOUND

For the equation:

Si + O2 ---> SiO2

1 mol Si + 1 mol O2 ---> 1 mol SiO2

6.022 x 10^23 "ATOMS" Si + 6.022 x 10^23 "MOLECULES" O2 ---> 6.022 x 10^23 "MOLECULES" SiO2

If this is not what you mean, then pls ask again, it may be related to the other aspect of Avogadro's principle of gases and equal volumes of gases = equal volumes of moles


(my example is just to illustrate the point, even though also SiO2 really exists as a network solid so its stretching it a bit to think of it as a single molecule)
 
Thanks for the explanation. You cleared up a lot of the confusion I had. Can you also explain the other aspect of Avogadro's principle of gases and equal volumes of gases = equal volumes of moles that you mentioned please?
 
glad you got the first part


Avogadro's principle (this he really did - Avogadro's number he never calculated - they just honored him with it since the Principle led others to the huge number)

Comparing gases AT THE SAME TEMP AND PRESSURE (same conditions - not necessarily at STP) in a reaction mixture...

- the volume of Gas A will have the same number of molecules (or can say moles) of Gas B if Gas B has the with the same volume as Gas A

Classic example:

H2 + Cl2 ---> 2HCl

coefficients 1 1 2
volumes (eg. in L) 1L 1L 2L
molecules/mole 1 1 2



or N2 + 3H2 ---> 2NH3

coefficients 1 3 2
volumes (eg. in L) 1L 3L 2L
molecules/mole 1 3 2


so we can predict the volumes of gases using stoichiometry

just remember this works ONLY if the gases are under the same conditions
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top