Axis angle rotations and changing rotation values

dumb_squared
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have two 3d applications and when an object(a cube for example) is transferred between them, the rotation values of the cube change(the object stay at the same location. translation and scale values stay the same) and I can't find why that occurs and it's driving me crazy.

app 1 rotation values:

x:-27,077
y:-25,026
z:15,933

Axis-angle representation of the above

-0.7096853 0.4914011 -0.5048483 -42.20802

app 2 rotation values:

x:33.8493041
y:-13.7234678
z:26.2455062

I've read a few wikipedia articles on rotation and specifically axis-rotation stuff but I haven't really figured out what's really happening.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're jumping in a bit to deep, getting to specifics way too early. Before we get to the specifics, there are some key important question that needs to be addressed:
  • Are these your applications or are the someone else's? In other words, did you write the code?
  • If you didn't write the code, did you carefully read the documentation (if it exists) and follow it?
  • If you did write the code, did you carefully test it?
  • How does the code represent composite bodies, sub-bodies, and the connections between them?
  • Is this transfer is an atomic action, or is it essentially a detachment immediately followed by an attachment? If it's the latter, is it the attachment or detachment where things go awry?
 
D H said:
You're jumping in a bit to deep, getting to specifics way too early. Before we get to the specifics, there are some key important question that needs to be addressed:
  • Are these your applications or are the someone else's? In other words, did you write the code?
  • If you didn't write the code, did you carefully read the documentation (if it exists) and follow it?
  • If you did write the code, did you carefully test it?
  • How does the code represent composite bodies, sub-bodies, and the connections between them?
  • Is this transfer is an atomic action, or is it essentially a detachment immediately followed by an attachment? If it's the latter, is it the attachment or detachment where things go awry?

Sorry about lack of clarity. Both applications are closed sourced and there is no information about how they store the data.

The transfer file format converts x,y,z angles to Axis-angle representation
 
Yes, but what do those angles have to do with a rotation? A single axis of rotation can be given by its three direction angles- the angles the axis makes with the three coordinate axes. Also, if this is the case, x, y, and z are not independent. We must have x^2+ y^2+ z^2= 1. Is that what you mean? Where do you give the angle through which you are rotating?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top