BA Physics at Boston Univ - Does a BA Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nealh149
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bachelor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of enrolling in a Physics program at Boston University, which offers a Bachelor of Arts (BA) instead of a Bachelor of Science (BS). The BA is perceived as less rigorous, particularly in mathematics, which raises concerns for those aiming for technical careers in physics. However, many participants argue that the distinction between BA and BS may not significantly impact future academic or career opportunities, emphasizing the importance of the specific courses taken rather than the degree title. Examples from other institutions, like Berkeley, illustrate that serious physics programs can exist with only a BA option. Personal experiences highlight that some individuals with a BA have successfully pursued graduate studies and careers in physics without facing disadvantages. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that while a BS may be preferable for technical paths, a BA can still provide a solid foundation for further study, especially if the coursework aligns with graduate school requirements.
nealh149
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
I was planning on enrolling at Boston University as a Physics major, but they only offer a BA in Physics and no BS. Will this matter much?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been puzzled by BA vs BS in sciences.

Given the choice, I would prefer a BS, which as far as I can tell is more rigorous in the application of mathematics. On the other hand, I know a skilled mathematician who has a BA.

I'd recommend comparing various curricula from different programs in order to make an assessment.
 
B.S. usually is meant for more technical concentration, while B.A. is usually a choice for going into a different field after earning the undergraduate degree, such as going into teaching, or some kind of professional school. What really matters is the selection of courses actually taken and what you understand and what you know how to do; not so much on earning either B.A. or B.S.
 
Look at what they say about their undergraduate program: http://buphy.bu.edu/undergrad

It's obviously a serious program. If you take the appropriate courses obtaining a BA should be no obstacle to further study in physics.

There are many serious physics programs that only offer a BA.
 
If that's all you college offers, I don't think it matters at all. Perhaps, you'd be better off getting a BS over a BA if they were both offered.

Just a data point, Berkeley only offers a BA in math. That's just how it is there.
 
my professor who I had for both advanced mechanics and advanced E&M, he was upset because he had to graduate with a BA in physics instead of a BS, even though he had completed all the courses for the BS, because of some technicality.

He got into graduate school in physics, got his phd and is now a full professor of physics. Having a BA vs BS did not matter at all in his case, in retrospect, it wasn't worth getting upset over at the time.
 
I was a BA physics major for a couple years (I switched to a BS before I actually took any liberal arts classes). So I can tell you about my experience, but I don't know if it will apply to BU or the other schools you're looking at. At my school, the BA physics major required fewer physics courses, and more liberal arts courses. Here's the specifics.

At my school, the BS physics majors had to take the following four "core courses."

Analytical Mechanics
Electricity and Magnetism
Statistical and Thermal Physics
Quantum Mechanics

We also had to take a two-semester course entitled "Methods of Experimental Physics." During the second semester we designed and carried out a ten-week project; this was easily the most useful class I've ever taken. We also had to take a further upper division physics class, an advanced undergraduate math class, and technical electives, which could be physics and math courses, or other science classes.

BA physics majors only had to take two of the four core courses. Furthermore they could replace the MXP project with a different type of project. And they had to take fewer technical electives, which could be replaced by liberal arts classes. Finally, BA physics majors (like all BAs at my school) had to take four semesters of foreign language.

So what's the difference? Everyone, including my advisors, told me that there is none. However, before I decided to go to graduate school, I tried my hand at getting a job. Many jobs didn't differentiate between BS and BA degrees. But believe it or not, I ran into employers who asked specifically for a BS. Personally I think that if you're looking to go into physics as a career, a BS is certainly a better choice. In addition to the bias among employers, a BS will require you to take the classes that graduate schools are looking for. Grad school will likely care more about the general relativity class you took than about your proficiency at sociology or even foreign language. If you're looking for a less technical career, such as high school teaching, science writing, etc., then these might be good cases for a BA degree. A BA might also be easier if you're double majoring, since your liberal arts requirements can be satisfied by the other major. In fact one reason I was a BA was because I wanted to do a second major in math (I eventually decided to just take an extra semester and get two BS degrees).

Just one additional note. I've found that graduate admissions committees are fairly objective, so I doubt that they'll discriminate according to the word "Arts." If you have a BA, but have taken BS-level coursework, I doubt it will matter at all.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
382
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top