Ball coordinates to cartesian coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting spherical coordinates (r, theta, phi) to Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z). Users express confusion regarding the interchange of angles theta and phi in different contexts, particularly between physics and mathematics. Solutions provided for the given spherical coordinates are noted, but there is a call for clarification on the conversion process. A suggestion is made to visualize the problem through drawing or modeling to better understand the relationships between the coordinates. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent notation and understanding the underlying concepts in coordinate transformations.
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I am struggeling with the following problem:

give the x,y,z coordinates from the following ball points/vectors

1. (r, theta, phi) = (sqrt3, 3/4pi, 3/4pi)

2. (r, theta, phi) = (1, 1/6pi, 1 1/6pi)

the sollutions I found in my reader are as followed:

1. (x, y, z) = (-1/2 sqrt3, 1/2 sqrt3, -sqrt3/sqrt2)

2. (x, y, z) = 1/4 sqrt3, -1/4, 1/2 sqrt3)

can someone explain to me what was actually done here? I understand the conversion from carthesian coordinates to ball and cylinder coordinates but I can't seem to find the sollution for the other way around. Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
These equations might be of some use...
 
Muzza said:
These equations might be of some use...

Yep. It seems the angles \theta and \phi are interchanged though.
It's funny. In my physics books the azimuthal angle is always \phi and in most of my mathematics books it's \theta.
Oh well, guess it doesn`t matter as long as you're aware of it.
 
I would suggest that, instead of plugging this into a set of "conversion equations", you draw the situation (or even build a little model with a box) so that you see how the quantities are related. Once you do this with one problem, the second will be much easier.
 
Galileo said:
Yep. It seems the angles \theta and \phi are interchanged though.

It brings this up.

Unfortunately, the convention in which the symbols \theta and \phi are reversed is frequently used, especially in physics, leading to unnecessary confusion.

:P
 
That's because notation is not as important as meaning, but we must always specify.

Using astronomy language, I always used \theta for "declination" (angle from vertical axe) and \phi for "Right ascension" (angle from horizontal axe from left to right)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top