Ball hitting racket - Momentum Question (ENGAA 2017)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a momentum problem involving a ball hitting a racket, specifically focusing on the change in momentum and the direction of velocities. Participants are analyzing the implications of sign conventions in momentum calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between initial and final velocities, questioning why different assumptions about their signs lead to different results. There is a focus on the mathematical expressions used to calculate momentum and the implications of directionality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the need for careful consideration of signs in momentum calculations, particularly regarding the direction of forces and velocities. There is ongoing exploration of how these factors affect the final momentum expression.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the definitions of initial and final velocities, as well as the conditions under which the problem is framed, such as the assumption that the force acts in a specific direction.

TomK
Messages
69
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
ENGAA 2017 - Question 52
Relevant Equations
Force = rate of change of momentum
Please scroll-sown to Question 52: https://www.undergraduate.study.cam.ac.uk/files/publications/engineering_s1_qp_2017.pdf

The correct answer is 'B'. This is the working I did:

F = (change in momentum) / (change in time)

change in momentum = mv - mu, where v = final velocity and u = initial velocity

initial velocity = +u, final velocity = -v (as velocity reverses direction after hitting racket)

change in time = t2 - t1m (-v - (+u)) = F (t2 - t1)
-mv - mu = Ft2 - Ft1
mv = Ft1 - Ft2 - mu
mv = F (t1 - t2) - mu

As you can see, my answer is wrong. I don't understand why. What's strange is that if you assume final velocity = +v and initial velocity = -u, you'll get the change in momentum to be m (v - (-u)) = mv + mu. Then, you'll get the right answer after rearranging.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TomK said:
As you can see, my answer is wrong. I don't understand why. What's strange is that if you assume final velocity = +v and initial velocity = -u, you'll get the change in momentum to be m (v - (-u)) = mv + mu. Then, you'll get the right answer after rearranging.
What's strange about that?
 
PeroK said:
What's strange about that?

Why does it work one way but not the other? The velocities are still in opposite directions. What error have I made?
 
Try using vector. Then you will definitely get the right answer. Focus on the initial direction of the ball.
 
TomK said:
Why does it work one way but not the other? The velocities are still in opposite directions. What error have I made?
First, let's analyse your answer. Note that you are asked for the magnitude of the final momentum. You have: $$mv = F(t_1 - t_2) - mu$$ From the question ##u## is a speed, hence positive, as is ##F## and ##t_1 < t_2##. So, the expression you have on the right-hand side is negative. Which simply cannot be a magnitude. You should, therefore, have taken the modulus of this in any case to get a possible answer.

Second, let's analyse the question. If the initial speed ##u = 0##, then the magnitude of the final momentum is: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1)$$
Now, what happens when ##u > 0##? Is the final momentum greater or smaller? The force must first stop the ball and then accelerate it, so some of the impulse is used to get the ball to rest, leaving less impulse to accelerate it. That means we have to take away the ##mu##, leaving: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1) - mu$$ Note that we have used the assumption that ##F(t_2 - t_1) > mu##.

Finally, as suggested above, you could do a vector calculation. In which case, you need to use a vector for force. And, depending on the direction you take as positive, you will have ##\vec F = \pm F##. And that's your mistake. You take the force to be positive, regardless of the direction you consider as positive for your velocities. In one case you get the right answer, but when ##F## has the wrong sign you get the wrong answer.
 
PeroK said:
First, let's analyse your answer. Note that you are asked for the magnitude of the final momentum. You have: $$mv = F(t_1 - t_2) - mu$$ From the question ##u## is a speed, hence positive, as is ##F## and ##t_1 < t_2##. So, the expression you have on the right-hand side is negative. Which simply cannot be a magnitude. You should, therefore, have taken the modulus of this in any case to get a possible answer.

Second, let's analyse the question. If the initial speed ##u = 0##, then the magnitude of the final momentum is: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1)$$
Now, what happens when ##u > 0##? Is the final momentum greater or smaller? The force must first stop the ball and then accelerate it, so some of the impulse is used to get the ball to rest, leaving less impulse to accelerate it. That means we have to take away the ##mu##, leaving: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1) - mu$$ Note that we have used the assumption that ##F(t_2 - t_1) > mu##.

Finally, as suggested above, you could do a vector calculation. In which case, you need to use a vector for force. And, depending on the direction you take as positive, you will have ##\vec F = \pm F##. And that's your mistake. You take the force to be positive, regardless of the direction you consider as positive for your velocities. In one case you get the right answer, but when ##F## has the wrong sign you get the wrong answer.

Thank you. I now know I should have given F a '-' sign in-front, since force is acting in the negative direction, as I assumed positive to be right to left.

initial velocity = +u
final velocity = -v

F = change in p/change in t

-F = (-mv - mu)/(t2 - t1)
-F(t2 - t1) = -mv - mu

mv = F(t2 - t1) - mu
This is the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K