Ball rolling down a surface - where is the axis of rotation?

AI Thread Summary
When a ball rolls down a surface, the point of contact is often considered the axis of rotation, as its velocity is zero at that point. However, this creates confusion when calculating torque, as the textbook indicates that friction generates torque based on the radius of the ball, implying a shift to the center of mass as the axis. The discrepancy arises because while the point of contact can be viewed as the instantaneous center, the torque is not zero since the gravitational force does not act through this point. The choice of axis of rotation affects the calculation of torque but does not alter the physical behavior of the system. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between friction, torque, and the axis of rotation in rolling motion.
lillybeans
Messages
67
Reaction score
1
In my textbook, it says that when a ball rolls down a surface, inclined or not, the point of contact can be thought of as the pivot or the axis of rotation, since at the point of contact, the ball's velocity is zero. Makes sense, but then the textbook becomes inconsistent in problems solving.

2iqda4o.jpg


There are a few exercises of spheres rolling down surfaces, both inclined and non-inclined. If the point of contact between the ball and the surface is the axis of rotation, then the torque done by friction would be zero because it passes through the axis of rotation! In other words, it acts AT the pivot, the point of contact. But in the solutions, they clearly say the torque done by friction is "fR, where R is the radius of the ball". But aren't they now REDEFINING the axis to be the center of mass, hence the "R"?

I guess gravity is not affected by the axis of rotation in either of these cases cause it always passes through the axes of rotation in both cases. But friction is.

Can anyone explain the discrepancy? Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point of contact is called the instantaneous center. The torque is not zero because the force (mg) does not pass through it.
 
Axis of rotation is wherever you define it to be. This sets up your frame of reference. It doesn't change anything physically. Torque also depends on your choice of center.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top