Ballistics - calculating initial velocity

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial velocity required for a projectile to land at a known distance on a flat surface, drag force must be considered, complicating the problem significantly. The drag force is represented by a simplified formula, where the drag coefficient is a key factor. The discussion highlights the need for differential equations to account for the effects of drag, as traditional kinematic equations become insufficient. A proposed method involves using the relationship between horizontal and vertical motion to derive the initial velocity, factoring in the drag coefficient and launch angle. Ultimately, a formula for initial velocity that incorporates these variables is sought for accurate projectile motion simulation.
Einherj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

This is my first post so be gentle. :smile:

I am programming a ballistics related script to a predefined physics engine. I am no physicist nor a mathematician so my knowledge in these things is quite limited.

To the point:
I need to calculate the initial velocity needed to shoot a projectile for it to land to known distance. Let's assume that we are using a flat surface. The physics engine uses a quite simplified drag formula which is something like this:
D = Dc * V^2, where Dc is the predefined drag coefficient for that projectile.

We know...
... the angle of the gun
... the distance to the target.
... the drag coefficient for the projectile

I would provide you with more information, but frankly I don't know what info is needed to make this work. Please ask me for anything you need to make this function.

Thanks for your responses in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okaaay...It seems to me that the inclusion of the drag force severely complicates the problem and changes it from an elementary kinematics problem to a rather sticky differential equation problem. I don't know offhand how you'd attempt it without calculus. I've made a couple of assumptions:

1. D is a FORCE...right?
2. D always acts in a direction opposing that of the particle's velocity.

Using Newton's 2nd law, we can set up the equation of motion:

\vec{F} = -mg\hat{y} - D_c |\vec{v}|^2 \hat{v} = m\vec{a}

-mg\hat{y} - D_c |\vec{v}|^2 \left(\frac{\vec{v}}{|\vec{v}|}\right) = m\vec{a}

-mg\hat{y} - D_c |\vec{v}| \vec{v} = m\vec{a}

-mg\hat{y} - D_c \sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2} (v_x\hat{x} + v_y\hat{y}) = m\vec{a}

Now we can write a separate equation for the horizontal component and the vertical component (dropping the unit vectors). We can also express the velocities as the first derivatives of the corresponding particle trajectories, and the accelerations as the second derivatives of the particle trajectories:

-D_c \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2} \frac{dx}{dt} = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}

-mg - D_c \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2} \frac{dy}{dt} = m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}

These ODE's look really ugly to solve. They're coupled, and they're non-linear. So I'm stuck here. Am I over-complicating this? Does anyone else have any insight?
 
Without the drag, the differential equations are easy to solve, and the results are:

horizontal position:

x(t) = x_0 + v_{x_0}t = (v_0 \cos\theta)t

vertical position:

y(t) = y_0 + v_{y_0}t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2 = (v_0 \sin\theta)t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2

At a specified launch angle and initial velocity, the projectile is only going to spend a certain time airborne. In fact, it's vertical position will increase, reach a maximum, and then decrease until it hits the ground. To find this time airborne, we set

y(t) = 0 \Longrightarrow \frac{1}{2}gt^2 = (v_0 \sin\theta) t

t = \frac{2v_0 \sin \theta}{g}

Now, the question is, how much horizontal distance does the projectile traverse during this time airborne? If the target is a distance d away, then we WANT it to be equal to d:

x\left(\frac{2v_0 \sin \theta}{g} \right) = d

(v_0 \cos\theta)\left(\frac{2v_0 \sin \theta}{g} \right) = d

Solve for v0:

v_0 = \sqrt{\frac{gd}{2\cos \theta \sin \theta}} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\textrm{no drag})

Now you have the magnitude of the initial velocity in terms of the known parameters, which is what you need in order to write the program.
 
Thanks for those cepheid.

I have been able to create a script using the model without drag, but as expected the projectiles fall short from their target. So it's crucial to be able to add the drag factor in.

This is what someone else has concluded with the same physics engine:
I figured that it would be too complicated for the engine to calculate the reference area of the projectile, to use different fluid densities depending on the atmospheric pressure etc. I pretty much assumed that the makers had chosen to use a drag formula looking something like this: Fd = v² * k (where k is just one big constant representing all the constant elements).

Since F = m * a
we can set up a formula like this:
m * a = v² * k

So the formula for the (de-)acceleration of the projectile is:
a = (v² * k) / m

Since the mass of the projectile is constant we might as well let m be a part of k too. Sic:
a = v² * k

Now the only part left was to find out what k was. This can be found from the engine's config files and it seems that k is around -0.0005, but it varies between projectiles.

I don't know if that helps at all, but the more the merrier or something like that. :smile:
 
Last edited:
real world equivalent

The real world formula for calculating the initial velocity would help too.
If these facts are known:

- we are on earth
- the surface is flat
- mass of the projectile
- drag coefficient of the projectile
- angle of the gun
- landing distance

what would be the formula for calculating the initial velocity?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top