Balsa Span Designs: Brainstorming Efficient Designs

  • Thread starter Thread starter SolomonKane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Span
AI Thread Summary
Efficient designs for balsa wood spans include options like inverted triangles and arch substructures, which provide strong support. Buttressing with cement blocks on either side is suggested to enhance stability. Current bridge designs, while efficient in material use, may not be the simplest or most effective for balsa wood applications due to their dynamic load requirements. The discussion emphasizes the need for innovative designs that leverage the unique properties of balsa wood and glue. Overall, the brainstorming process aims to identify optimal structural solutions for balsa spans.
SolomonKane
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What do you think the most efficient designs are for a balsa wood span? I was considering an inverted triangle or arch substructure, but I am in the brainstorming process and need other options. In addition, I was considering an extra measure to support the span by buttressing the two cement blocks on either side.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try looking at some current bridge designs. I imagine that they are very efficient, as bridge building material is expensive!
 
Considering that the materials are limited to the balsa wood and glue, current bridge designs are not necessarily the most simple or efficient. Also note that while bridges are restricted by the purpose of carrying a dynamic load on a deck, the span does not have this hindrance.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top