Barrel roll with/without slipping

  • Thread starter Thread starter dislect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roll Slipping
AI Thread Summary
A barrel that slips down an inclined plane will reach the bottom faster than one that rolls without slipping. The mathematical analysis shows that for rolling, the final velocity is V=√(4/3)gh, while for slipping, it is V=√(2)gh. The rolling barrel's velocity is lower due to energy distribution between translational and rotational motion. In contrast, the slipping barrel converts all gravitational potential energy into translational kinetic energy. Thus, the slipping barrel achieves a higher velocity at the bottom of the incline.
dislect
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm wondering if I roll a barrel which rolls without slipping down an inclined plane vs. a barrel which only slips down the plane - who will get down faster and how can I show it mathematically ?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by drawing free body diagrams for each situation. Then you can calculate the acceleration.
 
Do what Doc Al have told you, the final result is that the barrel that slips down falls faster than the one that rolls.
 
For rolling without slip:
mgh=0.5Iω + 0.5mV^2, I=0.5MR^2 ->
mgh=0.25mR^2 * (V/R)^2 +0.5MV^2
gh=0.25V^2 + 0.5V^2 ->
V=√4/3 gh

For slip only:
mgh=0.5mV^2 ->
V=√2gh

and so the Velocity at the bottom of the inclined plane is higher for slip only. is that correct?
 
dislect said:
For rolling without slip:
mgh=0.5Iω + 0.5mV^2, I=0.5MR^2 ->
mgh=0.25mR^2 * (V/R)^2 +0.5MV^2
gh=0.25V^2 + 0.5V^2 ->
V=√4/3 gh

For slip only:
mgh=0.5mV^2 ->
V=√2gh

and so the Velocity at the bottom of the inclined plane is higher for slip only. is that correct?
That's correct. (I see you modeled the barrel as a solid cylinder, which is OK.)
 
Thank you for the help! much appreciated
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Back
Top