Barriers & Tunneling: Find No Reflection & Max. Reflection Thresholds

  • Thread starter Thread starter zbhest123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tunneling
zbhest123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Let 11.0-eV electrons approach a potential barrier of height 3.8 eV.
2. (a) For what barrier thickness is there no reflection? (b) For what barrier thickness is the reflection a maximum?
3. For part (a) I tried using kL=npi where k=sqrt(2m(E-V))/hbar, because this is where the Probability of transmission T=1.
The equation for probability of transmission is given by T=(1+V^2sin^2(kL)/(4E(E-V)))^-1. V is the potential barrier, 3.8 eV
I solved for L, getting: L=npi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)), but I still don't know n. (n is an integer) And when ignoring n I get the wrong answer.
The answer I get is 7.623e-19.
The answer in the book is L=.229nm or any integer multiple thereof.
I have no idea what to do from here, I also multiplied the top and the bottom by c=3e8 due to electron mass m=.511e6 eV/c^2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zbhest123 said:
I solved for L, getting: L=npi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)), but I still don't know n. (n is an integer) And when ignoring n I get the wrong answer.

n is just any integer, because if pi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)) satisfies the equation sin(k1*L)=0, so do all of its integer multiples.

The answer I get is 7.623e-19.
The answer in the book is L=.229nm or any integer multiple thereof.
[/b]

Check over your algebra. Did you remember to convert E and V to joules?
 
Nevermind! I got it using the equation: T=(1+V^2sin^2(kL)/(4E(E-V)))^-1

Simplifying to sin^2(kL)=0

Originally I put it in my calculator to find arcsin(0) equal to 0. It was then pointed out to me that it can also equal pi. So I used Lk=pi, simplified to L=pi/k, which gave me a correct answer.

Thanks!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top