Basic Electric Field in Conductor Principles

AI Thread Summary
A conductor with a cavity containing a point charge q will induce a net charge of -q on the cavity wall due to electrostatic equilibrium, as established by Gauss's Law. The outer surface of the conductor will then have a charge of Q0 + q to maintain the overall charge of the conductor as Q0. Field lines in the cavity must originate from the point charge q and terminate on the cavity wall, as there are no other sources for the electric field in that region. The electric field inside the conductor remains zero, confirming that field lines cannot terminate within the conductor itself. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between charge distribution and electric field behavior in conductors.
FallenLeibniz
Messages
86
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The following is a small concept exercise from an. EM text (Electromagnetism: Pollack and Stump). I believe I have the explanations correct, but am just looking for "peer-review" as they seem "hand-wavy":

Suppose a conductor has a cavity inside it, and there is a point charge q somewhere in the cavity. Prove that the net charge on the wall of the cavity must be -q. If the net charge of the conductor is Q0[\SUB], what is the net charge on its outer surface? Why must every field line in the cavity begin on q and on the cavity wall? (Hint: For the last statement, use the fact that ##\oint\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}## )

Homework Equations


[/B]Other than the one in the statement of the problem, nothing really as it is a concept question more than anything.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) [/B]Let ##\vec{E}_{int}## be the field inside the conductor material (which is of course ##\vec{0}##). Let S be a gaussian surface that is large enough to both enclose the cavity and a small portion of the conductive material. Since ##\vec{E}_{int}\cdot d\vec{A}## at S is zero, it follows from Gauss's Law that the enclosed charge is zero. Taken with the fact that a conductor may have no overall charge density inside itself when in equilibrium except at surface boundaries, the wall must have -q.

b) ##Q_0## +q. As before stated, a conductor may only carry charge on its surface boundaries. Since we have established that -q is on one boundary inside the conductor, ##Q_0## +q must be on the outside for the net charge of the conductor to be ##Q_0## only. Note that this also finds validity when considering an empty cavity.

c) To start, a field must have a source. Since the only source for the field in the cavity is the charge, it must start there. Note that the fact that the closed integral of the dot product is zero means that any field that meets the boundaries of a curve must do so perpendicularly. Now the field can not terminate inside the cavity since it can not just arbitrarily terminate in mid air and the field can not travel through or terminate in the conductor since the internal conductor field must be zero. Thus the field must terminate on the cavity boundary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FallenLeibniz said:

Homework Statement


The following is a small concept exercise from an. EM text (Electromagnetism: Pollack and Stump). I believe I have the explanations correct, but am just looking for "peer-review" as they seem "hand-wavy":

(a) Suppose a conductor has a cavity inside it, and there is a point charge q somewhere in the cavity. Prove that the net charge on the wall of the cavity must be -q.
(b) If the net charge of the conductor is Q0, what is the net charge on its outer surface?
(c) Why must every field line in the cavity begin on q and on the cavity wall? (Hint: For the last statement, use the fact that ##\oint\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}## = 0. )

Homework Equations


[/B]Other than the one in the statement of the problem, nothing really as it is a concept question more than anything.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) [/B]Let ##\vec{E}_{int}## be the field inside the conductor material (which is of course ##\vec{0}##). Let S be a gaussian surface that is large enough to both enclose the cavity and a small portion of the conductive material. Since ##\vec{E}_{int}\cdot d\vec{A}## at S is zero, it follows from Gauss's Law that the enclosed charge is zero. Taken with the fact that a conductor may have no overall charge density inside itself when in equilibrium except at surface boundaries, the wall must have -q.

b) ##Q_0## +q. As before stated, a conductor may only carry charge on its surface boundaries. Since we have established that -q is on one boundary inside the conductor, ##Q_0## +q must be on the outside for the net charge of the conductor to be ##Q_0## only. Note that this also finds validity when considering an empty cavity.

c) To start, a field must have a source. Since the only source for the field in the cavity is the charge, it must start there. Note that the fact that the closed integral of the dot product is zero means that any field that meets the boundaries of a curve must do so perpendicularly. Now the field can not terminate inside the cavity since it can not just arbitrarily terminate in mid air and the field can not travel through or terminate in the conductor since the internal conductor field must be zero. Thus the field must terminate on the cavity boundary.

I've rewritten your problem statement slightly for clarity.
I agree with (a) and (b) and am not sure of (c), especially the statement that " ... the fact that the closed integral of the dot product is zero means that any field that meets the boundaries of a curve must do so perpendicularly." That integral is zero anywhere in an electrostatic environment. The reason the E field is perpendicular to the metallic surface is that the metallic surface is an equipotential and the E field is always perpendicular to the equipotential surface. The rest of your statement sounds right. Maybe someone else will comment more on this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top