Basic question on wave equation - need a reminder

  • Thread starter Thread starter VictorVictor5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
AI Thread Summary
To convert the cosine wave equation Ex=E_0*cos(wt-kz) to sine, one can use the identity Cos(x) = Sin(π/2 - x), leading to Cos(ωt - kz) = Sin(π/2 - (ωt - kz)). For wave equations traveling in the positive z direction, the convention is typically to use the form (kz - ωt). This choice indicates that the peak of the wave moves in the positive z-direction with a phase velocity of ω/k. Understanding this relationship clarifies the transition between cosine and sine representations in wave equations.
VictorVictor5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Greetings all and new to the forum here.

It's been many years and I've forgotten how to do it, and it should be a basic question, but assuming we have an equation Ex=E_0*cos(wt-kz), how do we translate to sine? I've seen it written sin(kz-wt) or sin(wt-kz), but I've just plainly forgotten how to get from cos(wt-kz) to sin nomenclature, and which dependence is right (kz-wt or wt-kz).

Thanks!
VV5
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For starters, you can say:
Cos(\omega t - k z) = Sin\big(\frac{\pi}{2}-(\omega t - k z)\big)
for the same reason that
Cos(x) = Sin\big(\frac{\pi}{2}-x\big)

Then, for a wave, where the z-coordinate of its peak increases with time (so the wave travels in the positive z direction), the most popular convention is (kz-\omega t) (both work, but you need to stick to one for whatever problem you're doing).

To see how this works, you can think that where (kz-\omega t)=0, you have that Cos(kz-\omega t)=1, a peak.

As t increases, we have to have that z=\frac{\omega}{k}t to be at the location where that peak is (i.e., where (kz-\omega t)=0).

So with this convention, the z-coordinate of that peak moves in the positive z-direction with a velocity \frac{\omega}{k}. This velocity is also known as the phase velocity of the wave.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that cleared it up!

VV5
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top