Basic Time Dilation and Relativity Questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses fundamental concepts of time dilation and relativity. It clarifies that the time-dilation effect is not about the functioning of clocks but rather the nature of time itself in different reference frames. Events simultaneous for one observer may not be simultaneous for another moving observer due to the relativity of simultaneity. It emphasizes that no experiment can determine absolute motion between two observers moving at constant velocity relative to each other. Lastly, time dilation does not imply that time actually passes more slowly; rather, it is a relative perception based on the observer's frame of reference.
Epsillon
Messages
69
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


1) The time-dilation effect is sometimes expressed as "moving clocks run slowly" Actually, this effect has nothing to do with motion affecting the functioning of clocks. What then does it deal with?

2) Will two events that occur at the same place and same time for one observer be simultaneous to a second observer moving with respect to the first?

3)You are in a windowless car in an smooth train. Is there any physical experiment you can do in the train car to determine wether you are moving?

4)Does time dilation mean that time actually passes more slowly in moving refrence frames or that it only seems to pass more slowly?

The Attempt at a Solution


1)This is very hard cause it doesent really makse sense cause we just started learning about this. Well my answer would be that when moving faster light travels more therefore more time?? But regular clocks don't have cloks in them:confused:

2) yes if they happen in the SAME place wouldn't be simultanous to both?

3) there is nothing you can do cause all laws of motion are similar in two reference frames

4) Actually passes more slowly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For 1) I'm not sure what your grader would like to hear. But first of all, remember whenever you talk about "motion", that there is no "absolute motion". Secondly: is time dilation an effect of the clock? Or is it more fundamental (what do we use clocks for?)

For 2) I can give you a clear answer. Consider someone who is precisely in the center of a smoothly moving train and suppose two lasers are fired simultaneously from each end of the train, towards the middle. Will the passenger conclude when he calculates the time the lasers were fired. What would someone outside the train see?

3) is correct and very important. It means that two observers moving at constant velocity relative to each other can never do an experiment to decide whether one of them is "absolutely at rest".

4) is a bit of a trick question. If each observer looks at their own watch, they will see no strange effects, even if they are moving at 99% of the speed of light relative to the other. Time doesn't seem to pass more slowly for any of them, nor does it actually do. So please try to be more specific in your answer.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top