Lie Detection: Testing Truth or Falsehood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mrencko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detection Testing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of a lie detector in a criminal case, highlighting its accuracy rates: 95% for detecting lies and 10% for falsely indicating a lie when the suspect is truthful. Participants express confusion over the phrasing of the problem and the calculations needed to determine the probabilities associated with the lie detector's readings. There is a consensus that the questions seem incomplete and require a clearer context for accurate interpretation. The conversation emphasizes the need for a priori probabilities to fully analyze the situation, suggesting a Bayesian approach to understanding the results. Overall, the complexities of interpreting lie detector results and their implications for legal judgments are central to the discussion.
Mrencko
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A crime has been committed and the police have only captured a suspect, although he obviously claims to be innocent. To give a verdict the judge authorizes the use of the lie detector. The manufacturer of the device warns the authority that the lie detector in 10% of the cases in which it has been used showed a positive reading (that is to say lie), since in fact the suspect spoke with the truth. So too, the detector in 95% of the cases, has given a positive reading when the suspects really lied.
A) tell a lie the detector shows a positive reading
B) do not tell a lie and the detector shows positive reading
C) tell a lie and the detector shows negative reading
D) do not lie and the detector shows a negative reading

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


well this might be too simple or to complex i don't know, but i need to know if i am right in my responses because my career is in play.
a)95%
b)10%
c)5%
d)90%
i use the complement of probabilities to estimate the ungiven probabilities if i am wrong please help me
pr(F/T)=0.10 pr(Fc/T)=0.90
pr(F/L)=0.05 pr(Fc/L)=0.95
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that the exact problem statement in English? It has a strange phrasing.
 
Yes it is, in fact very weird problem
 
(A) to (D) are not even complete sentences, and there is no actual problem statement.

I guess your interpretation is reasonable, but it is really guesswork. With the given numbers you cannot calculate more than what you did.
 
Because it is a translation it is hard to be sure, but in English the questions read as though they refer to joint probabilities (lie AND positive). That would require some a priori probability of a lie, which we do not have, but if we were to have such the whole question setting would make more sense. It would lead into asking the probability of guilt given the result of the lie detector. Very Bayesian.
 
i can swear that the problem is like that, i think the problems are designed by the profesor, can't find it in the internet, so its very weird
just gives two data as you can see above and 4 questions i can't put the questions in this way
a) probability of lie given the detector shows positive reading i think this mean pr(L/Fc)
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top