Beam of particles in momentum space

Habeebe
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I'm mostly concerned with whether or not I understand this problem intuitively in order to answer the final part of this problem.

Homework Statement


Discuss the implications of Liouville's theorem on the focusing of beams of charged particles by considering the following case. An electron beam of circular cross section (radius R0) is directed along the z-axis. The density of electrons across the beam is constant, but the momentum components transverse to the beam are disctributed uniformly over a circle of radius p0 in momentum space. If some focusing system reduces the beam radius from R0 to R1 find the resulting distribution of the transverse momentum components. What is the physical meaning of this result? (Consider the angular divergence of the beam.)


Homework Equations


Aellipse=πr1r2

The Attempt at a Solution



I answered that the circle in momentum space would become an ellipse of equal area, thereby satisfying the equation R_0^2=R_1R_p where R_p is the radius of the ellipse along the momentum axis. The next part is what I'm feeling sketchy on: the physical meaning. It seems like the focusing causes an increased tendency of the beam to want to converge/diverge, that is, the divergence of the beam is increased proportional to the change of radius from R0 to R1.

Does this sound right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. The focusing of the beam increases its angular divergence, which means that the particles will have a greater tendency to spread out over a wider area in space. This is because the transverse momentum components are distributed uniformly over an ellipse rather than a circle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top