Understanding Beer's Law and Calculating Absorbance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Feodalherren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying Beer's Law to calculate absorbance and concentration from transmittance data. The user expresses confusion about the units and the meaning of εb, mistakenly thinking it relates to % transmittance. They correctly identify that absorbance (A) can be calculated using the formula A=log(1/%T) but are troubled by their resulting graph showing a negative slope instead of the expected positive linear relationship. The conversation emphasizes the importance of plotting concentration against log transmittance to establish a calibration curve, which should yield a straight line. The user is encouraged to share their graph for further analysis.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



photo.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm at a loss here. I'm not given any units... I know the concentration is C in Beer's law (awesome name btw). But what is my εb? Is it % transmittance?

So then for A

A= (.055)(.0001)
What does this even mean?Ops this was supposed to go to the chemistry forums.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the question they are asking? Incidentally, Beer is the guy's name.

Let me guess the question. They give you the transmittance of an unknown solution, and they want you to find its concentration.

Chet
 
εb doesn't matter here.

This is about constructing calibration curve, C vs A. Form the Beer's law (AKA Lambert-Beer's law) you know the dependence is linear (A=kC), so it is enough to determine the value of k - and it doesn't matter what are its components.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Have your graphics program plot the concentration (y axis) as a function of the transmissivity (x axis). Have your graphics program use a semi-log scale for transmissivity). The graph will come out to be a straight line. Have your graphics program fit an equation to this straight line. This will express the concentration as a linear function of log of transmissivity. This will constitute your calibration.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
That's where I kind of get lost.
So my Cs are obviously given. Now I found a formula for A which was
A=log(1/%T) so I found my absorbance numbers.

Thing is, they increase with a lower T as shown by the above equation. I should get a line that has a y-intercept of approximately 0, my line goes the wrong way, it has negative slope :/.
 
Feodalherren said:
That's where I kind of get lost.
So my Cs are obviously given. Now I found a formula for A which was
A=log(1/%T) so I found my absorbance numbers.

Thing is, they increase with a lower T as shown by the above equation. I should get a line that has a y-intercept of approximately 0, my line goes the wrong way, it has negative slope :/.
What does your plot of log T as a function of C look like? It should be a straight line.

Chet
 
It is a straight line but the slope is negative and it has a big y-intercept...

I get absorbances to be the following
A 1.3
B .646
C .335
D .165
E .082
 
Feodalherren said:
It is a straight line but the slope is negative and it has a big y-intercept...

I get absorbances to be the following
A 1.3
B .646
C .335
D .165
E .082
Is it possible to show us your graph?

Chet
 
Back
Top