Insights Beginner's Guide to Precalculus, Calculus and Infinitesimals

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on improving a beginner's guide to precalculus and calculus, particularly regarding the use of LaTeX for mathematical expressions. Key points include the definition of infinitesimals through sequences and the need for clearer notation, such as using epsilon (ε) instead of X for small positive numbers. The conversation highlights the importance of defining absolute values for sequences and clarifying inequalities involving sequences and real numbers. There is also a suggestion to simplify the terminology by focusing on hyperreals rather than hyperrationals, as the latter is less commonly referenced. Overall, the thread emphasizes clarity and precision in mathematical writing for better understanding.
Physics news on Phys.org
A great improvement would be to use LaTeX in this article instead of things like Xn, x^2, and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes AJb, bhobba, vanhees71 and 2 others
Okay, guys, I got the message.

Valid point. It has been a long time since I used LaTex. It will take a while, but I will fix it.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, vanhees71 and berkeman
bhobba said:
Infinitesimals
Let X be any positive number. Let x be the sequence xn = 1/n. Then, an N can be found such that 1/n < X for any n > N. Hence, by the definition of less than in hyperrational sequences; x < X. Such hyperrational sequences are called infinitesimal. A sequence, x, is infinitesimal if |x| < X for any positive X. If x > 0, x is called a positive infinitesimal. If x < 0, x is called a negative infinitesimal. Normally zero is the only number with that property. Also, we have infinitesimals smaller than other infinitesimals, e.g. 1/n^2 < 1/n, except when n = 1.

This is just a small section of your article that I took a close look at. I haven't looked closely at the other parts. Here are some comments about your work as well as ways that I would write this differently.

Instead of X I would use ##\epsilon##, which is typically used in many mathematics textbooks to denote a "reasonably small" but positive real number.

Instead of "Let x be the sequence xn = 1/n." I would define an identifier S like so, using set notation: Let S be the sequence ##\{x_n : x_n = \frac 1 n, n \in \mathbb N \}##

Your inequality "x < X" leaves a lot unstated and hurts my head to look at. Namely that a sequence x of numbers (which I'm calling S) is less than a single positive real number X (which I'm calling ##\epsilon##. I think you addressed this in another Insights article, but it would be good to also include it here. My version of this would be that ##S < \epsilon## means that all but a finite number of elements in S are less than ##\epsilon##.

You wrote: "A sequence, x, is infinitesimal if |x| < X"
You haven't defined the absolute value/norm of a sequence, or if you did, I missed it. If I have a sequence ##S = \{1/2, 1/3, 1/4, \dots, 1/n, \dots \}## and ##\epsilon = 0.01##, what's the value of |S| here? And how can I determine whether ##|S| < \epsilon##?

Last, I'm not sure that you need to talk about hyperrationals as opposed to hyperreals. All the number in my sequence are rationals, sure enough, but they are also reals. If I search for "hyperrational" on the internet, I don't get a lot of results.
 

Similar threads