Bernoulli effect for spinning disks

AI Thread Summary
A stationary disk experiences atmospheric pressure, while a spinning disk at 10,000 RPM experiences altered pressure due to the Bernoulli effect and Ekman flow. The no-slip condition at the gas-solid interface causes the air to move with the disk, but it cannot withstand centrifugal forces, leading to Ekman flow. The static pressure on a spinning disk remains the same as on a stationary disk, and the Bernoulli Theorem is often misunderstood regarding pressure differences. Experiments demonstrate that air moving parallel to a surface does not reduce static pressure, contradicting common beliefs about Bernoulli's principles. Aircraft lift is attributed to the Coanda Effect rather than Bernoulli's principle, as it involves angular acceleration of air creating low-pressure areas.
cyber one
For a stationary disk, the air pressure on the platter is atmospheric
pressure.

For a disk spinning at 10,000 RPM, say 140 miles per hour for a 5.25
inch disk, I assume the Bernoulli effect would reduce the pressure,
but because of the Ekman flow, the pressure would be more than the
pressure would be on a non-rotating disk in which the air was moving
over the disk surface linearly at 120 miles per hour.

The so-called no-slip property of gas-solid interfaces requires that
the gas in the immediate vicinity of a spinning disk move with the
disk. Unlike the solid comprising the disk, however, the gas spinning
with the disk cannot withstand the concomitant centrifugal force. The
resulting outward spiraling flow is called Ekman flow.

Can you give me an approximate estimate of the percentage of
atmospheric pressure a spinning disk platter at 10,000 RPM would
"experience"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The static pressure on a spinning disk is the same as the static pressure on a stationary disk. The Bernoulli Theorem is greatly missunderstood. In the classical classroom demonstration the difference in pressure across a restriction is caused by the increased pressure in front of the restriction not the reduced pressure due to increased velocity after the restriction. There is no reduction in static pressure due to air moving parallel to a surface. Try this experiment - Lay a piece of FLAT paper on a porous surface (Grill Pan) blow air over it with a powerful blower - IT WILL NOT LIFT as Bernoulli would have us believe. Similarly aircraft lift has nothing to do with Bernoulli but caused by the angular acceleration of the air (Coanda Effect) causing low pressure areas as the air which has finite mass tried to bend to follow the curvature of the wing.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top