Best Textbooks for Hamiltonian/Lagrangian Classical Mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on recommendations for textbooks related to the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations of classical mechanics. Participants share their experiences and preferences regarding various texts, considering the needs of a project or presentation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein as a recommended textbook, citing its clarity and depth.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for Goldstein but offers no strong alternative.
  • Sommerfeld's book is mentioned as a good reference by one participant.
  • A participant critiques Thornton and Marion's book, describing it as unreadable and noting that Goldstein's text was preferred in their class for clarity on scattering theory.
  • One participant recommends R. Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" for a condensed overview of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics, suggesting it is effective for a presentation format.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the specific goals of the project, suggesting various texts based on different needs, including Feynman's "The Principle of Least Action," Schaum's Outlines, and advanced texts like Lanczos and Arnol'd for those interested in foundational studies.
  • A participant clarifies that their project allows for exploration under a professor's guidance, aiming to understand the mathematical formulation of classical mechanics and potentially extending to quantum mechanics.
  • There is a question about the differences between the second and third editions of Goldstein's book, with a response indicating minimal changes and suggesting that the updates may not be substantial.
  • Another participant recommends "Mechanics" by Landau et al. as an additional resource.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the best textbooks, with no clear consensus on a single recommended text. Multiple competing views on preferred resources remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific needs or contexts for their textbook recommendations, such as preparing for presentations or studying foundational principles, which may influence the appropriateness of each suggested text.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in classical mechanics, particularly those seeking textbook recommendations for Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations, may find this discussion beneficial.

SeReNiTy
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a project next semester on the hamiltonian/lagrangian formulation of classical mechanics and i was wondering what would be the best textbooks to learn from?

I've already studied some maths including calculus, calculus on manifolds, linear algebra, abstract algebra...

I was reccomended Classical Mechanics (Goldstein), what do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eeh, Goldstein, perhaps??
Alternatively, you might use Goldstein.
 
Sommerfeld's Book is also a good reference.
 
i found thornton and marion's book on the subject unreadable.

here's a telling example: during our coverage of scattering theory in my school's undergraduate classical mechanics class, the prof actually made print-outs from goldstein's text since it was far superior to T-n-M's.

i haven't read anything else from goldstein, but those few pages were very clear.
 
If you're only doing a "project" (a presentation, I'll assume), then you need something substantial, but to-the-point. In other words, you want something that'll teach you the entire Hamiltonian/Lagrangian formulation, in a nutshell. That's usually the most efficient way to gather information for a presentation/report.

With this in mind, I actually recommend...a quantum mechanics textbook! Chapter 2 of R. Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" is devoted to a quick review of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics, and it contains all the basic concepts, principles and equations, in about 30 pages. It's condensed, but effective and efficient. So this is my recommendation.

Of course, if you want the most rigorous introduction known to man, then go ahead and use Goldstein. But since you're only giving a presentation, I'm guessing you want the Cliffs Notes version -- which can be found in Shankar's book.
 
What is it that you want to do in the subject..specifically?

Required reading: Feynman's "The Principle of Least Action" chapter in vol II of the Feynman Lectures. (Some interesting related introductions are here http://www.eftaylor.com/leastaction.html )

Do you want to do textbook problems?... Schaum's Outlines, Marion-Thornton, Landau-Lifshi[/color]tz, Goldstein, Fetter-Walecka

Do want to prepare for QM and QFT?
For QM, yes... use a quantum text. For relativistic field theory, you might like Doughty's Lagrangian Interaction.
[advanced: Mackey]

Do you want to study foundations? (e.g. variational principles, geometrical structure)... Lanczos, [very advanced: Arnol'd, Abraham-Marsden, http://mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/ ]

A nice book [if you can find it] with a mix of geometrical foundations and problems is Woodhouse's Analytical Mechanics http://www.worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/top3mset/463b7ef715179873a19afeb4da09e526.html
 
Essentially this "project" is just a unit where i can freely learn anything of my choice under the guidance of a professor. I've chosen to learn a proper formulation of classical mechanics with the intent to have a better understanding of the mathematical formulism (namely the lagragian/hamiltonian).

If time permits during the semester, i'll investigate the extension of these formulisms to quantum mechanics...

Btw, what is the difference between the second and third editions of goldstein's book?
 
SeReNiTy said:
Btw, what is the difference between the second and third editions of goldstein's book?

Ha! Practically nothing. The cover is different, that's about all. And the end-of-chapter exercises are rearranged to occur in different numerical order. You can even find errors in the latest edition! I get the suspicion that publishers don't want all the errors to be corrected, because then there can be no excuse for a new edition, and hence no new profits...
 
Check out Mechanics by Landau et al
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
20K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K