Beta Decay Problem: Solve KE of Recoil Nucleus

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a beta decay:

\ {X_Z^A} \rightarrow\ {Y_{Z+1}^A} \ + {\beta_{-1}^{0}}\ + {\bar\nu_e}


To show that the KE of the recoil nucleus is

\ E = \frac{\ Q + \ 2 \ m \ c^2}{\ 2 \ M_Y \ c^2}\ {T_{max}}

m and T(max) is the mass and maximum KE of beta particle

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



writing the expression for Energy conservation,we see that the electron rest energy terms cancels and the resulting equation is:

\ {T_y} + \ {T_\beta} + \ {T_{\bar\nu}}=\ Q = [ \ {M_x} - \ {M_y} - \ {M_{\beta}} - \ {M_{\bar\nu}} ] \ {c^2}

For beta particle kinetic energy to be maximum, the kinetic energy of the neutrinos must be zero.(The kinetic energy of the recoiling nucleus assumed non-zero).

This gives an equation with known \ {T_y} + \ {T_\beta}

But we need another equation to solve for the kinetic energy of Y.

I also used conservation of momentum---disregarding the momentum of the neutrinos.But that did not help.Can anyone please tell how to do it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
P²=p² [P---momentum of Y,p---momentum of beta particle]

P²c²=p²c²

(E+E')(E-E')=(e+e')(e-e') [E---energy of Y,E'---rest energy of Y, e---energy of

beta particle and e'---rest energy of beta particle]

K(K+2Mc²)=T(T+2mc²) [K-KE of Y and T---KE of beta particle]

T²-K²+2mc²T=2KMc²=(T+K)(T-K)+2Tmc² ~QT+2Tmc² where (T-K)~T

K= [(Q+2mc²)T]/(2Mc²)

Hence proved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top